Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Iain M.
dc.contributor.authorMaddam, George
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Laura H.
dc.contributor.illustrator
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T08:57:32Z
dc.date.available2025-05-07T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2025-05-08T08:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-07
dc.identifier.citationFletcher IM, Maddam G, Charalambous L (2025) 'Differences in muscle activation and joint kinematics between deadlift styles when performed at high intensity training loads', International Journal of Strength & Conditioning, 5 (1)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2634-2235
dc.identifier.doi10.47206/ijsc.v5i1.396
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/626641
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the conventional (CDL), sumo (SDL) and hex-bar (HBD) deadlift actions at a high intensity training load across a wide range of leg and back muscles to explore which lift has the biggest impact on prime mover musculature. Twelve males (age: 19 ± 2 years; height: 1.81 ± 0.81 m; body mass: 85.64 ± 10.87 kg) performed 3 repetitions of HBD, CDL and SDL at a 90% 1RM intensity. Load lifted, EMG for the Erector Spinae Longissimus, Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, Semitendinosus, Rectus Femoris, and Vastus Medialis and knee and hip range were compared via effect size magnitude of change. The EMG results showed a general pattern of greater muscle activity, considered a large effect, during the HBD compared to the CDL and SDL, possibly due to the greater absolute load lifted during the HBD. The only anomaly to this was greater EMG activity for the bicep femoris within the CDL compared to the HBD, large effect, and the SDL, moderate effect. This finding was attributed to the greater hip flexion seen in the start position for the CDL compared to other lifts. These findings suggest that the HBD would be the preferred deadlift technique for total muscle recruitment and load lifted for high intensity (90% 1RM) training regimes. However, the CDL would be the preferred lift if bicep femoris muscle activity were a specific targeted requirement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Universities Strength and Conditioning Associationen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/article/view/396/489
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectlift performanceen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::C600 Sports Scienceen_US
dc.titleDifferences in muscle activation and joint kinematics between deadlift styles when performed at high intensity training loadsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2634-2235
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Strength & Conditioningen_US
dc.date.updated2025-05-08T08:52:39Z
dc.description.notenot on Open Policy Finder but states is Diamond OA https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/information/librarians and all articles seem to have cc licences, so presuming we can add final version when published RVO 8/5/25
refterms.dateFOA2025-05-08T08:57:33Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Differences+in+Muscle+Activati ...
Size:
567.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
final published version
Thumbnail
Name:
DLEMG&KinematicComparisonsFlet ...
Size:
379.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
author's accepted version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International