Children's health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school
Name:
s12966-024-01621-7.pdf
Size:
1.224Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
final published version
Authors
Xiao, ChristinaScales, James
Chavda, Jasmine
Dove, Rosamund E.
Tsocheva, Ivelina
Wood, Helen E.
Kalsi, Harpal
Sartori, Luke
Colligan, Grainne
Moon, Jessica
Lie, Esther
Petrovic, Kristian
Day, Bill
Howett, Cheryll
Keighley, Amanda
Mihaylova, Borislava
Toffolutti, Veronica
Grigg, Jonathan
Randhawa, Gurch
Sheikh, Aziz
Fletcher, Monica
Mudway, Ian S.
Beevers, Sean
Gauderman, William
Griffiths, Christopher J.
van Sluijs, Esther
Panter, Jenna
Affiliation
University of CambridgeQueen Mary University of London
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research
University of Bedfordshire
Social Action for Health
University of Oxford
University of Edinburgh
MRC Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma
Imperial College London
University of Southern California
Issue Date
2024-09-05Subjects
active travelchildren’s health
clean air zones
health policy
natural experiment
ULEZ
Ultra Low Emission Zone
Subject Categories::L510 Health & Welfare
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), introduced in Central London in April 2019, aims to enhance air quality and improve public health. The Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) study evaluates the impact of the ULEZ on children's health. This analysis focuses on the one-year impacts on the shift towards active travel to school. CHILL is a prospective parallel cohort study of ethnically diverse children, aged 6-9 years attending 84 primary schools within or with catchment areas encompassing London's ULEZ (intervention) and Luton (non-intervention area). Baseline (2018/19) and one-year follow-up (2019/20) data were collected at school visits from 1992 (58%) children who reported their mode of travel to school 'today' (day of assessment). Multilevel logistic regressions were performed to analyse associations between the introduction of the ULEZ and the likelihood of switching from inactive to active travel modes, and vice-versa. Interactions between intervention group status and pre-specified effect modifiers were also explored. Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes. Relative to the children in Luton, children in London were more likely to have switched from inactive to active modes (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.21-10.92). Children in the intervention group were also less likely to switch from active to inactive modes (OR 0.11, 0.05-0.24). Moderator analyses showed that children living further from school were more likely to switch from inactive to active modes (OR 6.06,1.87-19.68) compared to those living closer (OR 1.43, 0.27-7.54). Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school.Citation
Xiao C, Scales J, Chavda J, Dove RE, Tsocheva I, Wood HE, Kalsi H, Sartori L, Colligan G, Moon J, Lie E, Petrovic K, Day B, Howett C, Keighley A, Mihaylova B, Toffolutti V, Grigg J, Randhawa G, Sheikh A, Fletcher M, Mudway I, Beevers S, Gauderman WJ, Griffiths CJ, van Sluijs E, Panter J (2024) 'Children's health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school', International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21 (1), 89Publisher
BMCPubMed ID
39232801PubMed Central ID
PMC11375866Additional Links
https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1479-5868EISSN
1479-5868Sponsors
This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (16/139/01). Additional funding is provided by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Applied Research Collaboration North Thames, Barts Charity, and the Mayor of London. CX is funded by the Cambridge Trust. EvS and JP are supported by the Medical Research Council (Unit Programme number MC_UU_00006/7, MC_UU_12015/6 and MC_UU_12015/7). BM acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203330). IM received funding from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency and Imperial College and the MRC Centre for Environment and Health, which is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/S0196669/1, 2019–2024). The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International