Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T08:37:49Z
dc.date.available2024-11-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T08:37:49Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-01
dc.identifier.citationStone R (2024) 'Spin and silence: royal penance and Carolingian propaganda', Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 58 (1), pp.-.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0071-9706
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/625908
dc.description.abstractSince the pioneering work of Mayke de Jong, many historians have studied the political use of penance in the Carolingian empire. This article explores how eighth- and ninth-century texts turned demands for penance and penitential acts by members of the royal family into political propaganda, and changes in such approaches. The earlier Carolingians preferred to remain silent about their own sins, while making limited use of penitential punishment for rivals. Louis the Pious’ more ambitious use of self-confession for Christian exaltation was initially successful, but the rise of rival camps of propagandists led to this confession later being turned against him. By 840, there was a new reluctance by rulers and others to admit culpability, reflected in the rise of the “non-confession confession”, in which penitential tropes were used without any specific personal fault being admitted. Lothar II in the 860s made ingenious attempts to harness penitential discourse to support his divorce and remarriage. His claims show a keen awareness of the possibilities and pitfalls of public confession, but he was finally unable to counter his opponents’ arguments. By the 870s, the development of widespread legal-penitential expertise paradoxically led to a new royal penitential silence, in which no ruler would publicly confess to any offence, however notoriousen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectmedievalen_US
dc.subjectpropagandaen_US
dc.titleSpin and silence: royal penance and Carolingian propagandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1613-0812
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKing's College Londonen_US
dc.identifier.journalFrühmittelalterliche Studienen_US
dc.date.updated2023-06-27T08:33:44Z
dc.description.noteRSS (27/6/23): Journal is gold open access. It is published annually, and I have been told that the volume I will be in will be published in November/December 2024, so I have embargoed the file until then. Once it is published, I will add the version of record.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Stone - Spin and Silence revised ...
Embargo:
2024-11-01
Size:
394.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Author accepted manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International