Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Mosopefoluwa
dc.contributor.authorTayong-Boumda, Rostand
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-02T08:05:11Z
dc.date.available2023-05-02T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2023-05-02T08:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-28
dc.identifier.citationSamuel M, Tayong RB (2023) '3D numerical analysis of the structural behaviour of a carbon fibre reinforced polymer drive shaft', Results in Engineering, 18 (101120)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2590-1230
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/625802
dc.description.abstractDue to their high strength and favourable mechanical behaviour, metals are used in a variety of applications within the automotive industry, including drive shafts. However, the use of metallic drive shafts in the automotive sector presents some disadvantages such as high inertial masses. This work investigates the mechanical benefits of using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) for manufacturing drive shafts. A Formula Student car was used as a model for the present work design for the drive shaft. Drive shafts made of Steel AISI 4340, Aluminium, and CFRP are investigated when subjected to mechanical excitations. Simulation includes the use of Comsol Multiphysics software. The CFRP drive shaft was modelled using the layered material feature. Various stacking sequences are tested. Results show that [90°/0°/-45°/+45°] sequence presents the best mechanical behaviour. Analytical and numerical calculations for the natural frequencies are performed and compared. CFRP drive shaft is observed to give the highest fundamental natural frequency when compared to the metallic counterparts. Fatigue analysis are also studied and revealed that the drive shafts can sustain the applied load for its expected fatigue life, with the CFRP drive shaft having the highest fatigue usage factor. Critical buckling analysis showed that the drive shaft made of steel has the highest critical buckling torque. However, drive shafts made of carbon fibre reinforced polymer was found to be 40.7% lighter than the aluminium tube and 79.6% lighter than the steel tube.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123023002475en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectdrive shaften_US
dc.subjectlightweight structureen_US
dc.subjectcarbon fibre/epoxyen_US
dc.subjectstress behaviouren_US
dc.subjectfatigue failureen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::H131 Automated Engineering Designen_US
dc.title3D numerical analysis of the structural behaviour of a carbon fibre reinforced polymer drive shaften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2590-1230
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.identifier.journalResults in Engineeringen_US
dc.date.updated2023-05-02T08:01:41Z
dc.description.notegold oa - pre-proof can be replaced with final version when available


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S2590123023002475-main+ ...
Size:
1.287Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
final published version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International