Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlugbaro, Margaret Iyabode Adenike
dc.contributor.authorWearmouth, Janice
dc.contributor.authorMaylor, Uvanney
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-24T13:23:59Z
dc.date.available2023-02-24T13:23:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.identifier.citationOlugbaro M,, Wearmouth J, Maylor U (2021) 'Using culturally responsive pedagogy to improve literacy learning within a supplementary school', in Wearmouth J, Lindley K (ed(s).). Bringing the curriculum to life: engaging learners in the English education system, , London: McGraw Hill pp.96-112.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9780335249879
dc.identifier.isbn9780335249886
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/625668
dc.description.abstractThe research discussed here is taken from a PhD study undertaken between 2012 and 2014 by one of the authors of the current chapter. It illustrates how the use of culturally responsive pedagogy together with an emancipatory approach of the sort advocated by Freire (2009) in one supplementary school contributed to overcoming issues of disaffection and lack of interest in reading and writing experienced by a group of culturally diverse students aged 11-14. The significance of such pedagogy is that it takes account of the individuality and cultural backgrounds of students, and what, therefore, students bring with them into the learning context of which teachers should be aware. The students were referred to the researcher by their parents who were concerned about their levels of progress in their mainstream schools. A supplementary school was established in a community centre for the purpose of addressing the literacy difficulties that were identified. Sessions were based on the National Curriculum in England (Department for Education (DfE) 2013) but pedagogy was adapted to meet students’ expressed interests and literacy learning needs as well as their diverse cultural backgrounds. Students were involved in every aspect of the sessions from planning to evaluation as befits an emancipatory approach. The outcomes were improved levels of attainment and re-engagement with literacy learning. The approach and its results cannot be generalized from such a small sample of participants. Nevertheless, there is an implication that even within the tight prescription of the National Curriculum there is room for a degree of flexibility to enable cultural responsiveness and sensitive engagement with students’ own views to improve their literacy learning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMcGraw Hillen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.mheducation.co.uk/bringing-the-curriculum-to-life-engaging-learners-in-the-english-education-system-9780335249879-emea-groupen_US
dc.subjectcultural factorsen_US
dc.subjectsupplementationen_US
dc.subjectliteracyen_US
dc.subjectschoolsen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::X300 Academic studies in Educationen_US
dc.titleUsing culturally responsive pedagogy to improve literacy learning within a supplementary schoolen_US
dc.title.alternativeBringing the curriculum to life: engaging learners in the English education systemen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.date.updated2023-02-24T13:19:48Z
dc.description.note


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record