• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Health
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Health
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UOBREPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutLearning ResourcesResearch Graduate SchoolResearch InstitutesUniversity Website

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Validation of a modified FRAX(R) tool for improving outpatient efficiency--part of the "Catch Before a Fall" initiative

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Catch before a fall - v20-10-14 ...
    Size:
    381.3Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    author's accepted version
    Download
    Authors
    Parker, Simon
    Ciaccio, Maria
    Cook, Erica Jane
    Davenport, Graham
    Cooper, Alun
    Grange, Simon
    Smitham, Peter
    Issue Date
    2015-08-14
    Subjects
    osteoporosis
    ambulatory care
    efficiency
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Summary We have validated our touch-screen-modifiedFRAX® tool against the traditional healthcare professional-led questionnaire, demonstrating strong concordance between doctor- and patient-derived results. We will use this in outpatient clinics and general practicetoincreaseour capture of the rate of at-risk patients, making valuable use of otherwise wasted patient waiting times. Introduction Outpatient clinics offer an opportunity to collect valuable health information from a captive population. We have previously developed a modified fracture risk assessment (FRAX®) tool, enabling patients to self-assess their osteoporotic fracture risk in a touch-screen computer format and demonstrated its acceptability with patients. We aim to validate the accuracy of our tool against the traditional questionnaire Methods Fifty patients over 50 years of age within the fractureclinic independently completed a paper equivalent of our touch-screen-modified FRAX® questionnaire. Responseswere analysed against the traditional healthcare professional(HCP)-led questionnaire which was carried out afterwards.Correlation was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa statistic and Fisher ’s exact test for each potentialFRAX® outcome of treat measure BMD and lifestyle advice Results The age range was 51 – 98 years. The FRAX® tool was completed by 88 % of patients; six patients lacked confidence in estimating either their height or weight. Following question adjustment according to patient response and feedback, our tool achieved >95 % sensitivity and specificity for the treatment and lifestyle advice groups, and 79 % sensitivity and 100 %specificity in the measure BMD group. Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.823 to 0.995 across all groups, demonstrating very good agreement for all. Fisher's exact test demonstrated significant concordance between doctor and pa-tient decisions. Discussion Our modifiedtoolprovidesa simple, accurateandreliable method for patients to self-report their own FRAX®score outside the clinical contact period, thus releasing theHCP from the time required to complete the questionnaireand potentially increasing our capture rate of at-risk patients
    Citation
    Parker S, Ciaccio M, Cook EJ, Davenport G, Cooper A, Grange S, Smitham P (2015) 'Validation of a modified FRAX(R) tool for improving outpatient efficiency--part of the "Catch Before a Fall" initiative', Archives of Osteoporosis, 10 (25), pp.1-8.
    Publisher
    Springer
    Journal
    Archives of Osteoporosis
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10547/625434
    DOI
    10.1007/s11657-015-0230-7
    PubMed ID
    26272713
    Additional Links
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-015-0230-7
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1862-3522
    Sponsors
    The Catch Before a Fall project has been funded with a grant from the National Osteoporosis Society (grant number 201)
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s11657-015-0230-7
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Health

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.
    • Authors: Hoff M, Meyer HE, Skurtveit S, Langhammer A, Søgaard AJ, Syversen U, Dhainaut A, Skovlund E, Abrahamsen B, Schei B
    • Issue date: 2017 Oct
    • [Efficacy of densitometry and fracture risk assessment tool FRAX in making therapeutic decisions in osteoporosis--a study on female patients of university of medical sciences endocrinology outpatient clinic].
    • Authors: Ignaszak-Szczepaniak M, Dytfeld J, Michalak M, Gowin E, Horst-Sikorska W
    • Issue date: 2009 Jun
    • Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
    • Authors: Bastos-Silva Y, Aguiar LB, Pinto-Neto AM, Baccaro LF, Costa-Paiva L
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
    • Authors: Lin J, Yang Y, Fei Q, Zhang X, Ma Z, Wang Q, Li J, Li D, Meng Q, Wang B
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.
    • Authors: Zerbini CA, Szejnfeld VL, Abergaria BH, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Kanis JA
    • Issue date: 2015
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.