Using behavioural science in public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of public health practitioners and behavioural scientists
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Byrne-Davis, LucieTurner, R.R.
Amatya, S.
Ashton, C.
Bull, Eleanor
Chater, Angel M.
Lewis, Lesley
Shorter, Gillian
Whittaker, Ellie
Hart, Jo
Affiliation
University of ManchesterManchester Metropolitan University
University of Bedfordshire
Public Health Wales
Queen's University Belfast
North Yorkshire County Council
Issue Date
2022-02-07
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction The emergence of COVID-19 and the importance of behaviour change to limit its spread created an urgent need to apply behavioural science to public health. Knowledge mobilisation, the processes whereby research leads to useful findings that are implemented to affect positive outcomes, is a goal for researchers, policy makers and practitioners alike. This study aimed to explores the experience of using behavioural science in public health during COVID-19, to discover barriers and facilitators and whether the rapidly changing context of COVID-19 influenced knowledge mobilisation. Methods We conducted a semi-structured interview study, with ten behavioural scientists and seven public health professionals in England, Scotland, Wales, The Netherlands and Canada. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis. Results We report three key themes and 10 sub-themes: 1.Challenges and facilitators of translation of behavioural science into public health (Methods and frameworks supported translation, Lack of supportive infrastructure, Conviction and sourcing of evidence and Embracing behavioural science) 2. The unique context of translation (Rapid change in context, the multi-disciplinary team and the emotional toll). 3. Recommendations to support future behavioural science translation (Embedding experts into teams, Importance of a collaborative network and showcasing the role of behavioural science). Discussion Barriers and facilitators included factors related to relationships between people, such as networks and teams; the expertise of individual people; and those related to materials, such as the use of frameworks and an overwhelming amount of evidence and literature. Conclusion People and frameworks were seen as important in facilitating behavioural science in practice. Future research could explore how different frameworks are used. We recommend a stepped competency framework for behavioural science in public health and more focus on nurturing networks to facilitate knowledge mobilisation in future emergencies.Citation
Byrne-Davis, L.M.T., Turner, R.R., Amatya, S., Ashton, C., Bull, E.R., Chater, A.M., Lewis, L.J.M., Shorter, G.W., Whittaker, E. & Hart, J.K. (2022) 'Using behavioural science in public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of public health practitioners and behavioural scientists', Acta Psychologica, 224 (103527)Publisher
ElsevierJournal
Acta PsychologicaPubMed ID
35149259PubMed Central ID
PMC8818379Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0001-6918ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103527
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Related articles
- Individual health behaviours to combat the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from HIV socio-behavioural science.
- Authors: Haberer JE, van der Straten A, Safren SA, Johnson MO, Amico KR, Del Rio C, Andrasik M, Wilson IB, Simoni JM
- Issue date: 2021 Aug
- Examining the influences on the use of behavioural science within UK local authority public health: Qualitative thematic analysis and deductive mapping to the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework.
- Authors: Moffat A, Cook EJ, Chater AM
- Issue date: 2022
- [Expert committees in German public health policymaking during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a document analysis].
- Authors: Sell K, Saringer-Hamiti L, Geffert K, Strahwald B, Stratil JM, Pfadenhauer LM
- Issue date: 2021 Oct
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries.
- Authors: Colman E, Wanat M, Goossens H, Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S
- Issue date: 2021 Sep
- Experience of Kenyan researchers and policy-makers with knowledge translation during COVID-19: a qualitative interview study.
- Authors: Guleid FH, Njeru A, Kiptim J, Kamuya DM, Okiro E, Tsofa B, English M, Molyneux S, Kariuki D, Barasa E
- Issue date: 2022 Jun 1