• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Environmental science
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Environmental science
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UOBREPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutLearning ResourcesResearch Graduate SchoolResearch InstitutesUniversity Website

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in south east England

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Publisher version
    View Source
    Access full-text PDFOpen Access
    View Source
    Check access options
    Check access options
    Authors
    Church, Andrew
    Ravenscroft, Neil
    Affiliation
    University of Brighton
    Issue Date
    2007-05-23
    Subjects
    non-industrial private forests
    recreational access
    South East England
    forest ownership
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Informed by a growing international literature on the motivations of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners towards particular management goals, this paper reports the findings of a study into the responses of private and public/non-profit woodland owners to financial incentive schemes related to recreational access in South East England a highly urbanised region with considerable demand for outdoor recreation. The findings indicate that finance is the most important incentive for achieving uptake in these schemes to promote access. However, the propensity of owners to take up any incentive is not driven primarily by financial goals. Rather, it is a function of their predisposition towards the goals of the recreational access incentive scheme and the extent to which these goals are congruent with their self-identity as (largely) custodians of their woodland. In the case of promoting public access to private woodlands the study shows for the first time in the English context that, while few private woodland owners are predisposed towards granting additional access, the ability to deploy access incentives to longer-term stewardship goals may be sufficient to bring them into the scheme. The paper makes the argument that, to be successful, access incentive schemes must find ways of making the access component a central feature of grant aid while also incentivising longer-term management operations.
    Citation
    Church A, Ravenscroft N (2008) 'Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in south east England', Land Use Policy, 25 (1), pp.1-16.
    Publisher
    Elsevier
    Journal
    Land Use Policy
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10547/625159
    DOI
    10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.02.003
    Additional Links
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837707000166
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0264-8377
    Sponsors
    Funded by the Forestry Commission
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.02.003
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Environmental science

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.