Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristie, Mike
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Lopez, Berta
dc.contributor.authorChurch, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSiwicka, Ewa
dc.contributor.authorSzymonczyk, Pawel
dc.contributor.authorSauterel, Jasmin Mena
dc.identifier.citationChristie M, Martin-Lopez B, Church A, Siwicka E, Szymonczyk P, Sauterel JM (2019) 'Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature's contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia', Sustainability Science, 14 (5), pp.1267-1282.en_US
dc.description.abstractAssessments of the value of nature (e.g., TEEB. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, London, 2010) have tended to focus on the instrumental values of ecosystem services. However, recent academic and policy debate have highlighted a wider range of values (e.g., relational and intrinsic values), valuation methods (e.g., socio-cultural methods), and worldviews [e.g., indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems]. To account for these new perspectives, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has developed the concept of ‘Nature’s contributions to people’ (NCP), which aims to be a more inclusive approach to understanding and accounting for the diversity of values held by different stakeholders. In this paper, we aim to critically appraise the merits of the IPBES conceptual framework by reviewing of the findings the IPBES Europe and Central Asia (ECA) assessment. Our objectives are: (1) To review and assess the instrumental and relational values of NCP in Europe and Central Asia? (2) To consider what additional insights into the value of NCP are gained through the inclusion of socio-cultural valuations and ILK? Our analysis demonstrates that the ECA assessment captures a wide range of instrumental and relational values of NCP; however, we acknowledge variation in the availability of this value evidence. We also highlight new insights that can be uncovered through the adoptions of socio-cultural valuation methods and analysis of ILK knowledge. We conclude that the NCP paradigm, with its focus on instrumental and relational values, treats values more holistically than previous assessments such as TEEB (2010). For example, by giving a ‘voice’ to ILK holders, we demonstrated new types of NCP such as carrion removal, along with evidence of relational values including sense of place, identity, symbolic values and sacredness. While the ECA assessments may be defined as an example of a ‘Multiple evidence base’ approach to valuation of ecosystem assessments, the ECA assessment fails to demonstrate how to incorporate this wider range of values in decision-making processes.en_US
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subjectNature’s contributions to peopleen_US
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::F810 Environmental Geographyen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the diversity of values of “Nature's contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asiaen_US
dc.identifier.journalSustainability Scienceen_US
dc.description.noteThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Would have had no embargo based on Sherpa Romeo ( Deposited at Brighton University Repository prior to UoB repository ( CBoula, 22/10/2021

Files in this item

Christie2019_Article_Understan ...

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF