Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChater, Angel M.
dc.contributor.authorShorter, Gillian
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Vivien
dc.contributor.authorKamal, Atiya
dc.contributor.authorEpton, Tracy
dc.contributor.authorArden, Madelynne A.
dc.contributor.authorHart, Jo
dc.contributor.authorByrne-Davis, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorDrury, John
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, Ellie
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Lesley
dc.contributor.authorMcBride, Emily
dc.contributor.authorChadwick, Paul
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Daryl
dc.contributor.authorArmitage, Chris
dc.identifier.citationChater AM, Shorter GW, Swanson V, Kamal A, Epton T, Arden MA, Hart J, Byrne-Davis L, Drury J, Whittaker E, Lewis L, McBride E, Chadwick P, O’Connor DB, Armitage CJ (2021) 'Template for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts (TRICE)', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (19), pp.10255-.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Public health emergencies require rapid responses from experts. Differing viewpoints are common in science, however, “mixed messaging” of varied perspectives can undermine credibility of experts; reduce trust in guidance; and act as a barrier to changing public health behaviours. Collation of a unified voice for effective knowledge creation and translation can be challenging. This work aimed to create a method for rapid psychologically-informed expert guidance during the COVID-19 response. Method: TRICE (Template for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts) brings structure, peer-review and consensus to the rapid generation of expert advice. It was developed and trialled with 15 core members of the British Psychological Society COVID-19 Behavioural Science and Disease Prevention Taskforce. Results: Using TRICE; we have produced 18 peer-reviewed COVID-19 guidance documents; based on rapid systematic reviews; co-created by experts in behavioural science and public health; taking 4–156 days to produce; with approximately 18 experts and a median of 7 drafts per output. We provide worked-examples and key considerations; including a shared ethos and theoretical/methodological framework; in this case; the Behaviour Change Wheel and COM-B. Conclusion: TRICE extends existing consensus methodologies and has supported public health collaboration; co-creation of guidance and translation of behavioural science to practice through explicit processes in generating expert advice for public health emergencies.en_US
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subjectpublic healthen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::H123 Public Health Engineeringen_US
dc.titleTemplate for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts (TRICE)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.departmentQueen’s University Belfasten_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Stirlingen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNHS Education for Scotlanden_US
dc.contributor.departmentBirmingham City Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Manchesteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentSheffield Hallam Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Sussexen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNorth Yorkshire County Councilen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPublic Health Walesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Leedsen_US
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_US
dc.description.notegold open access

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF