Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDwivedi, Yogesh Kumar
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Laurie
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Christy M.K.
dc.contributor.authorConboy, Kieran
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Yanqing
dc.contributor.authorDubey, Rameshwar
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Marijn
dc.contributor.authorJones, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSigala, Marianna
dc.contributor.authorViglia, Giampaolo
dc.contributor.illustrator
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T09:24:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-21T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T09:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-21
dc.identifier.citationDwivedi YK, Hughes L, Cheung CMK, Conboy K, Duan Y, Dubey R, Janssen M, Jones P, Sigala M, Viglia G (2021) 'Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejection', International Journal of Information Management, 62 (102426)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-4012
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102426
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/625107
dc.description.abstractThe desk rejection of submitted articles can be a hugely frustrating and demotivating process from the perspective of the researcher, but equally, a time-consuming and vital step in the process for the Editor, tasked with selecting appropriate articles that meet the required criteria for further review and scrutiny. The feedback from journal Editors within this editorial, highlights the significant gaps in understanding from many academics of the journal assessment process and acceptance criteria for progression to the review stage. This editorial offers a valuable “lived-in” perspective on the desk rejection process through the lens of the Editor, via the differing views of nine leading journal Editors. Each Editor articulates their own perspectives on the many reasons for desk rejection, offering key insight to researchers on how to align their submissions to the specific journal requirements and required quality criteria, whilst demonstrating relevance and contribution to theory and practice. This editorial develops a succinct summary of the key findings from the differing Editor perspectives, offering a timely contribution of significant value and benefit to academics and industry researchers alike.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401221001195?dgcid=coauthoren_US
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectacademic writingen_US
dc.subjectpublicationsen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::X210 Research skillsen_US
dc.titleEditorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSwansea Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPune & Symbiosis International (Deemed University)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHong Kong Baptist Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNUI Galwayen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.contributor.departmentLiverpool John Moores Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDelft University of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Piraeusen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Portsmouthen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Aosta Valleyen_US
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Information Managementen_US
dc.date.updated2021-09-28T09:16:29Z
dc.description.note18m embargo
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-21T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
Editorial-DeskRejections+final.pdf
Embargo:
2023-03-21
Size:
395.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
author's accepted version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF