The relationship between vertical stiffness during bilateral and unilateral hopping tests performed with different strategies and vertical jump performances
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractVertical stiffness has been highlighted as a potential determinant of performance and may be estimated across a range of different performance tasks. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between vertical stiffness determined during 9 different hopping tests and performance of vertical jumps. Twenty healthy, active males performed vertical hopping tests with three different strategies (self-selected, maximal, and controlled) and three different limb configurations (bilateral, unilateral preferred, and unilateral non-preferred), resulting in nine different variations, during which vertical stiffness was determined. In addition, participants performed squat jump (SQJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) during which jump height, CMJ stiffness, and eccentric utilization ratio (EUR) were determined. Vertical stiffness in bilateral and unilateral preferred tasks performed with a self-selected and maximal, but not controlled, strategy was associated with stiffness in the CMJ (r = 0.61-0.64; p < 0.05). However, stiffness obtained during unilateral preferred and non-preferred hopping with self-selected strategy was negatively associated with performance in SQJ and CMJ tasks (r = -0.50 to -0.57; p < 0.05). These findings suggest that high levels of vertical stiffness may be disadvantageous to static vertical jumping performance. In addition, unilateral hopping with a self-selected strategy may be the most appropriate task variation if seeking to determine relationships with vertical jumping performance. HighlightsStiffness obtained during unilateral hopping with a preferred strategy was negatively associated with vertical jumping performancesStiffness obtained during hopping with preferred and maximal strategies was associated with stiffness obtained during a countermovement jumpIn this population, hopping stiffness may therefore be reflective of an individual's countermovement jump strategyHigh levels of stiffness may be disadvantageous to static-start vertical jumping.
CitationMohammadian M, Sadeghi H, Khaleghi Tazji M, Maloney SJ (2021) 'The relationship between vertical stiffness during bilateral and unilateral hopping tests performed with different strategies and vertical jump performances', European journal of sport science, (), pp. - .
PublisherTaylor and Francis
- A Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Drop Jumping Tasks in the Assessment of Vertical Stiffness.
- Authors: Maloney SJ, Richards J, Fletcher IM
- Issue date: 2018 Jun 1
- Effects of power and flexibility training on vertical jump technique.
- Authors: Hunter JP, Marshall RN
- Issue date: 2002 Mar
- Training specificity of hurdle vs. countermovement jump training.
- Authors: Cappa DF, Behm DG
- Issue date: 2011 Oct
- Relative net vertical impulse determines jumping performance.
- Authors: Kirby TJ, McBride JM, Haines TL, Dayne AM
- Issue date: 2011 Aug
- Body size and countermovement depth confound relationship between muscle power output and jumping performance.
- Authors: Markovic S, Mirkov DM, Nedeljkovic A, Jaric S
- Issue date: 2014 Feb