Fiscal expenditures on science and technology and environmental pollution: evidence from China
AffiliationHuazhong University of Science and Technology
Beijing Institute of Technology
University of Bedfordshire
European University Cyprus
Politécnico do Porto
University Giustino Fortunato
fiscal expenditures on science and technology (FESTs)
Subject Categories::F853 Pollution Control
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractStudying the driving factors of environmental pollution is of great importance for China. Previous literature mainly focused on the cause of national aggregate emission changes. However, research about the effect of fiscal expenditures on science and technology (FESTs) on environmental pollution is rare. Considering the large gap among cities in China, it is necessary to investigate whether and how FESTs affect environmental pollution among cities. We adopted three kinds of typical environmental pollutants including sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions, wastewater emission, and atmospheric particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5). Using the data of 260 prefecture-level cities over ten years in China, we found that FESTs play a significantly positive role in reducing sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and PM2.5 concentrations, but fail to alleviate wastewater emissions. Specifically, for every 1% increase in FESTs, SO2 emissions were reduced by 5.317% and PM2.5 concentrations were reduced by 5.329%. Furthermore, we found that FESTs reduced environmental pollution by impeding fixed asset investments and by promoting research and development activities (R&D). Moreover, the impacts of FESTs on environmental pollution varied across regions and sub-periods. Our results are robust to a series of additional checks, including alternative econometric specifications, generalized method of moments (GMM) analysis and overcoming potential endogeneity with an instrumental variable. Our findings confirm that government efforts can be effective on pollution control in China. Hence, all governments should pay more attention to FESTs for sustainable development and environmental quality improvements.
CitationXiong W, Han Y, Crabbe MJC, Yue X-G (2020) 'Fiscal expenditures on science and technology and environmental pollution: evidence from China', International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Public Health, 17 , pp.8761-8781.
PubMed Central IDPMC7728311
SponsorsThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71772013).
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China.
- Authors: Wu Y, Gu B, Erisman JW, Reis S, Fang Y, Lu X, Zhang X
- Issue date: 2016 Nov
- Urban energy environment efficiency in China: Based on dynamic meta-frontier slack-based measures.
- Authors: Li Y, Chiu YH, Lu LC
- Issue date: 2019 Mar
- Impact of internet electronic commerce on SO<sub>2</sub> pollution: evidence from China.
- Authors: Chen W, Yan W
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- The London low emission zone baseline study.
- Authors: Kelly F, Armstrong B, Atkinson R, Anderson HR, Barratt B, Beevers S, Cook D, Green D, Derwent D, Mudway I, Wilkinson P, HEI Health Review Committee.
- Issue date: 2011 Nov
- Multicontaminant air pollution in Chinese cities.
- Authors: Han L, Zhou W, Pickett ST, Li W, Qian Y
- Issue date: 2018 Apr 1