Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? a systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions
Oliver, Emily J.
Bambra, Clare L.
Stain, Helen J.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Youth comprise 40% of the world's unemployed, a status associated with adverse wellbeing and social, health, and economic costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis review synthesises the literature on the effectiveness of interventions targeting young people not in employment, education, or training (NEET). Methods: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with a concurrent or counterfactual control group and baseline equivalence are included. Cochrane collaboration tools are used to assess quality, and a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The primary outcome is employment; secondary outcomes were health, earnings, welfare receipt, and education. Results: Eighteen trials are included (9 experimental and 9 quasi-experimental), sample sizes range from 32 to 54,923. Interventions include social skills, vocational, or educational classroom-based training, counselling or one-to-one support, internships, placements, on-the-job or occupational training, financial incentives, case management, and individual support. Meta-analysis of three high-quality trials demonstrates a 4% (CI 0.0-0.7) difference between intervention and control groups on employment. Evidence for other outcomes lacks consistency; however, more intensive programmes increase employment and wages over the longer term. Conclusions: There is some evidence that intensive multi-component interventions effectively decrease unemployment amongst NEETs. The quality of current evidence is limited, leaving policy makers under-served when designing and implementing new programmes, and a vulnerable population neglected. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014007535
CitationMawn L, Oliver EJ, Akhter N, Bambra CL, Torgerson C, Bridle C, Stain HJ (2017) 'Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? a systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions', Systematic Reviews, 6 (1)
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd.
PubMed Central IDPMC5264339
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- Should we 'hug a hoodie'? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions with young people not in employment, education or training (so-called NEETs).
- Authors: Oliver EJ, Mawn L, Stain HJ, Bambra CL, Torgerson C, Oliver A, Bridle C
- Issue date: 2014 Jul 7
- Cancer-related health behaviours of young people not in education, employment or training ('NEET'): a cross-sectional study.
- Authors: Stewart CH, Berry P, Przulj D, Treanor C
- Issue date: 2017 Mar 2
- Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.
- Authors: Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, Allen E, Cairns J, Smith F, Jamieson E, Hargreaves K, Ingold A, Brooks L, Wiggins M, Oliver S, Jones R, Elbourne D, Santos A, Wong IC, O'Neill S, Strange V, Hindmarsh P, Annan F, Viner R
- Issue date: 2014 Mar
- Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
- Authors: Parker D, Mills S, Abbey J
- Issue date: 2008 Jun
- A cross-sectional exploration of the clinical characteristics of disengaged (NEET) young people in primary mental healthcare.
- Authors: O'Dea B, Glozier N, Purcell R, McGorry PD, Scott J, Feilds KL, Hermens DF, Buchanan J, Scott EM, Yung AR, Killacky E, Guastella AJ, Hickie IB
- Issue date: 2014 Dec 23