• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Applied social sciences
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Applied social sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UOBREPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutLearning ResourcesResearch Graduate SchoolResearch InstitutesUniversity Website

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Making any difference? conceptualising the impact of safeguarding adults boards

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Preston-Shoot, Michael
    Affiliation
    University of Bedfordshire
    Issue Date
    2019-11-25
    Subjects
    adult safeguarding
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose Criticisms of the effectiveness of Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) led to legislative reform in the shape of the Children and Social Work Act 2017. Given parallels between the mandates for LSCBs and Safeguarding Adults Boards (SABs), the onus is on SABs to demonstrate their effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to explore how SABs might more effectively demonstrate their impact across the range of their mandated responsibilities. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on definitions of impact from social work education, healthcare and from university research, exploring their relevance for capturing different types of data regarding the outcomes and impact of SAB activity. The paper also draws on frameworks for the process of capturing data and for implementing strategies designed to change practice and develop adult safeguarding services. Findings The paper argues that SABs have struggled to identify their impact and need to consider what types of impact they are seeking to demonstrate before choosing methods of seeking to capture that information. The paper also argues that SABs may have given insufficient thought to the process of change management, to the components needed to ensure that desired outcomes are embedded in procedural and practice change. Research limitations/implications This paper explores the challenges for SABs of identifying their impact and offers some theoretical frameworks that have defined different types of impact. The paper also draws on frameworks that identify the different components that are necessary for achieving change. This paper offers a contribution to theory building and is a response to the challenge of demonstrating the value that SABs add to adult safeguarding policy and practice. Practical implications A case study reviews the findings of the longitudinal service development and practice change initiative to embed making safeguarding personal in adult safeguarding. The findings of that initiative are mapped against the frameworks for identifying impact. Experience of implementing the initiative is mapped against the frameworks for effective implementation of change. Originality/value The paper presents frameworks for identifying the different types of outcomes and impact that SABs may achieve through their strategic business plans and for ensuring that the different components are present for the successful implementation and maintenance of change. The paper argues that the legal, policy and financial context within which SABs are located presents challenges as well as opportunities with respect to achieving and demonstrating impactful change. However, it also suggests that a more informed understanding of different types of impact may generate different approaches to data collection in order to capture what has been achieved.
    Citation
    Preston-Shoot M (2020) 'Making any difference? conceptualising the impact of safeguarding adults boards', Journal of Adult Protection, 22 (1), pp.21-34.
    Publisher
    Emerald
    Journal
    Journal of Adult Protection
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624104
    DOI
    10.1108/JAP-08-2019-0025
    Additional Links
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAP-08-2019-0025/full/html
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1466-8203
    EISSN
    1466-8203
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1108/JAP-08-2019-0025
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Applied social sciences

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.