Determinants of weekly sitting time: construct validation of an initial COM-B model and comparison of its predictive validity with the Theory of Planned Behaviour
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractObjective: In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration. Design: Using a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported sitting behaviour. Results: Self-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers. Conclusions: The behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours.
CitationHowlett N, Schul, J, Trivedi D, Troop N, Chater A (2020) 'Determinants of weekly sitting time: construct validation of an initial COM-B model and comparison of its predictive validity with the Theory of Planned Behaviour', Psychology and Health, 36 (1), pp.96-114.
PublisherTaylor & Francis
JournalPsychology and Health
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
- A prospective study exploring the construct and predictive validity of the COM-B model for physical activity.
- Authors: Howlett N, Schulz J, Trivedi D, Troop N, Chater A
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Breaking barriers: using the behavior change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome workplace inhibitors to breaking up sitting time.
- Authors: Ojo SO, Bailey DP, Brierley ML, Hewson DJ, Chater AM
- Issue date: 2019 Aug 16
- Predicting the monitoring/reading of communications on a smartphone among young drivers using an extended theory of planned behaviour.
- Authors: Murphy G, Gauld C, Lewis I
- Issue date: 2020 Mar
- Exploring Medication Adherence Amongst Australian Adults Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour.
- Authors: Liddelow C, Mullan B, Novoradovskaya E
- Issue date: 2020 Aug
- Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.
- Authors: Ojo SO, Bailey DP, Hewson DJ, Chater AM
- Issue date: 2019 Aug 14