Acute and chronic effects of foam rolling vs eccentric exercise on ROM and force output of the plantar flexors
Authors
Aune, Anne A.G.Bishop, Chris
Turner, Anthony
Papadopoulos, Kostas
Budd, Sarah
Richardson, Mark
Maloney, Sean J.
Issue Date
2018-06-12T00:00:00ZSubjects
range of motionself-myofascial release
reactive strength index
power
ankle
flexibility
C600 Sports Science
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Foam rolling and eccentric exercise interventions have been demonstrated to improve range of motion (ROM). However, these two modalities have not been directly compared. Twenty-three academy soccer players (age: 18 ± 1; height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m; body mass: 69.3 ± 7.5 kg) were randomly allocated to either a foam rolling (FR) or eccentric exercise intervention designed to improve dorsiflexion ROM. Participants performed the intervention daily for a duration of four weeks. Measurements of dorsiflexion ROM, isometric plantar flexion torque and drop jump reactive strength index were taken at baseline (pre-intervention) and at three subsequent time-points (30-min post, 24-hours post and 4-weeks post). A significant time x group interaction effect was observed for dorsiflexion (P = 0.036), but not for torque or reactive strength index. For dorsiflexion, there was a significant increase in both acute (30-min; P < 0.001) and chronic (4-week; P < 0.001) ROM for the eccentric group, whilst FR exhibited only an acute improvement (P < 0.001). Eccentric training would appear a more efficacious modality than foam rolling for improving dorsiflexion ROM in elite academy soccer players.Citation
Aune A, Bishop C, Turner A, Papadopoulos K, Budd S, Richardson M, Maloney S (2019) 'Acute and chronic effects of foam rolling vs eccentric exercise on ROM and force output of the plantar flexors', Journal of Sports Sciences, 37 (2), pp.138-145.Publisher
RoutledgeJournal
Journal of Sports SciencesPubMed ID
29893193Additional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640414.2018.1486000Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0264-0414ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/02640414.2018.1486000
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Related articles
- Effects of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling on Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion.
- Authors: Smith JC, Washell BR, Aini MF, Brown S, Hall MC
- Issue date: 2019 Aug
- Comparison between 6-week foam rolling intervention program with and without vibration on rolling and non-rolling sides.
- Authors: Kasahara K, Konrad A, Yoshida R, Murakami Y, Sato S, Aizawa K, Koizumi R, Thomas E, Nakamura M
- Issue date: 2022 Sep
- Remote effects of a 7-week combined stretching and foam rolling training intervention of the plantar foot sole on the function and structure of the triceps surae.
- Authors: Konrad A, Reiner MM, Gabriel A, Warneke K, Nakamura M, Tilp M
- Issue date: 2023 Aug
- The Acute and Prolonged Effects of Different Durations of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion, Muscle Stiffness, and Muscle Strength.
- Authors: Nakamura M, Onuma R, Kiyono R, Yasaka K, Sato S, Yahata K, Fukaya T, Konrad A
- Issue date: 2021 Mar
- Effects of Vibration Rolling with and without Dynamic Muscle Contraction on Ankle Range of Motion, Proprioception, Muscle Strength and Agility in Young Adults: A Crossover Study.
- Authors: Lyu BJ, Lee CL, Chang WD, Chang NJ
- Issue date: 2020 Jan 4