• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Sport and physical activity
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research from April 2016
    • Sport and physical activity
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UOBREPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutLearning ResourcesResearch Graduate SchoolResearch InstitutesUniversity Website

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Lower extremity stiffness: considerations for testing, performance enhancement, and injury risk

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Lower_Extremity_Stiffness_Cons ...
    Size:
    856.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    author's accepted version
    Download
    Authors
    Brazier, Jon
    Maloney, Sean J.
    Bishop, Chris
    Read, Paul
    Turner, Anthony
    Affiliation
    City and Islington College
    University of Bedfordshire
    Middlesex University
    Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha
    Issue Date
    2019-04-01
    Subjects
    plyometrics
    vertical stiffness
    stretch-shortening cycle
    leg stiffness
    compliance
    joint stiffness
    C600 Sports Science
    stiffness
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Brazier, J, Maloney, S, Bishop, C, Read, PJ, and Turner, AN. Lower extremity stiffness: considerations for testing, performance enhancement, and injury risk. J Strength Cond Res 33(4): 1156-1166, 2019 - Force-deformation characteristics of the lower limb have been associated with athletic performance and may modulate the risk of injury. Despite these known associations, measurements of lower extremity stiffness are not commonly administered by strength and conditioning coaches. This review provides an overview of the available literature pertaining to the effects of lower extremity stiffness on physical performance and injury risk. Practical methods of monitoring and training stiffness are also discussed. The cumulative body of evidence indicates that increases in lower extremity stiffness are associated with heightened performance in athletic tasks such as hopping, jumping, throwing, endurance running, sprinting, and changing direction. Relationships with injury are less conclusive because both excessive and insufficient limb stiffness have been postulated to increase risk. Thus, the optimal level of stiffness seems to be dependent on the anthropometry and physical capabilities of the athlete, in addition to sport-specific activity demands. Training interventions can positively enhance lower extremity stiffness, including isometric, eccentric, and isotonic strength training and plyometrics. Complex training also seems to provide a potent stimulus and may be more effective than the use of singular training modes. For plyometric activities, it is recommended that coaches use a developmental sequence of exercises with increasing eccentric demand to provide an appropriate stimulus based on the training age and technical competency of the athlete.
    Citation
    Brazier J, Maloney S, Bishop C, Read P, Turner A (2019) 'Lower extremity stiffness: considerations for testing, performance enhancement, and injury risk', Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33 (4), pp.1156-1166.
    Publisher
    NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association
    Journal
    Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10547/623752
    DOI
    10.1519/JSC.0000000000002283
    PubMed ID
    29112054
    Additional Links
    https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Citation/2019/04000/Lower_Extremity_Stiffness__Considerations_for.28.aspx
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1064-8011
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1519/JSC.0000000000002283
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Sport and physical activity

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Differences in lower extremity stiffness between endurance-trained athletes and untrained subjects.
    • Authors: Hobara H, Kimura K, Omuro K, Gomi K, Muraoka T, Sakamoto M, Kanosue K
    • Issue date: 2010 Jan
    • Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training.
    • Authors: Markovic G, Mikulic P
    • Issue date: 2010 Oct 1
    • Reactive and eccentric strength contribute to stiffness regulation during maximum velocity sprinting in team sport athletes and highly trained sprinters.
    • Authors: Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M
    • Issue date: 2020 Jan
    • The relationship between mechanical stiffness and athletic performance markers in sub-elite footballers.
    • Authors: Kalkhoven JT, Watsford ML
    • Issue date: 2018 May
    • The combination of plyometric and balance training improves sprint and shuttle run performances more often than plyometric-only training with children.
    • Authors: Chaouachi A, Othman AB, Hammami R, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG
    • Issue date: 2014 Feb

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Unilateral stiffness interventions augment vertical stiffness and change of direction speed

      Maloney, Sean J.; Richards, Joanna C.; Jelly, Luke; Fletcher, Iain M. (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2017-07-13)
      It has previously been shown that pre-conditioning interventions can augment change of direction speed (CODS). However, the mechanistic nature of these augmentations has not been well considered. The current study sought to determine the effects of pre-conditioning interventions designed to augment vertical stiffness on CODS. Following familiarization, ten healthy males (age: 22 ± 2 years; height: 1.78 ± 0.05 m; body mass: 75.1 ± 8.7 kg) performed three different stiffness interventions in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The interventions were: a) bilateral-focused, b) unilateral-focused, and c) a control of CODS test practice. Vertical stiffness and joint stiffness was determined pre- and post-intervention using a single leg drop jump task. CODS test performance was assessed post-intervention using a double 90o cutting task. Performances following the unilateral intervention were significantly faster than control (1.7%; P = 0.011; d = -1.08), but not significantly faster than the bilateral intervention (1.0% faster; P = 0.14; d = -0.59). Versus control, vertical stiffness was 14% greater (P = 0.049; d = 0.39) following the unilateral intervention and 11% greater (P = 0.019; d = 0.31) following the bilateral intervention; there was no difference between unilateral and bilateral interventions (P = 0.94; d = -0.08). The findings of the current study suggest that unilateral pre-conditioning interventions designed to augment vertical stiffness improve CODS within this experimental cohort.
    • Thumbnail

      Vertical stiffness asymmetries during drop jumping are related to ankle stiffness asymmetries

      Maloney, Sean J.; Richards, Joanna C.; Nixon, Daniel G.D.; Harvey, Lewis J.; Fletcher, Iain M. (Wiley, 2016-03-31)
      Asymmetry in vertical stiffness has been associated with increased injury incidence and impaired performance. The determinants of vertical stiffness asymmetry have not been previously investigated. Eighteen healthy males performed three unilateral drop jumps during which vertical stiffness and joint stiffness of the ankle and knee were calculated. Reactive strength index was also determined during the jumps using the ratio of flight time to ground contact time. ‘Moderate’ differences in vertical stiffness (t17 = 5.49; P < 0.001), ‘small’ differences in centre of mass displacement (t17 = -2.19; P = 0.043) and ‘trivial’ differences in ankle stiffness (t17 = 2.68; P = 0.016) were observed between stiff and compliant limbs. A model including ankle stiffness and reactive strength index symmetry angles explained 79% of the variance in vertical stiffness asymmetry (R2 = 0.79; P < 0.001). None of the symmetry angles were correlated to jump height or reactive strength index. Results suggest that asymmetries in ankle stiffness may play an important role in modulating vertical stiffness asymmetry in recreationally trained males.
    • Thumbnail

      A comparison of methods to determine bilateral asymmetries in vertical leg stiffness

      Maloney, Sean J.; Fletcher, Iain M.; Richards, Joanna C.; University of Bedfordshire (Taylor & Francis, 2015-07-31)
      Whilst the measurement and quantification of vertical leg stiffness (Kvert) asymmetry is of important practical relevance to athletic performance, literature investigating bilateral asymmetry in Kvert is limited. Moreover, how the type of task used to assess Kvert may affect the expression of asymmetry has not been properly determined. Twelve healthy males performed three types of performance task on a dual force plate system to determine Kvert asymmetries; the tasks were: a) bilateral hopping, b) bilateral drop jumping, and c) unilateral drop jumping. Across all three methods, Kvert was significantly different between compliant and stiff limbs (P < 0.001) with a significant interaction effect between limb and method (P = 0.005). Differences in Kvert between compliant and stiff limbs were -5.3% (P < 0.001), -21.8% (P = 0.007) and -15.1% (P < 0.001) for the bilateral hopping, bilateral drop jumping and unilateral drop jumping methods respectively. All three methods were able to detect significant differences between compliant and stiff limbs, and could be used as a diagnostic tool to assess Kvert asymmetry. Drop jumping tasks detected larger Kvert asymmetries than hopping, suggesting that asymmetries may be expressed to a greater extent in acyclic, maximal performance tasks.
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.