Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Leeen
dc.contributor.authorFitch, Natalieen
dc.contributor.authorCastle, Paul C.en
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Samuel L.en
dc.contributor.authorAldous, Jeffrey William Fredericken
dc.contributor.authorSculthorpe, Nicholasen
dc.contributor.authorMidgely, Adrianen
dc.contributor.authorBrewer, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorMauger, Alexis R.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17T12:18:15Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17T12:18:15Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-20
dc.identifier.citationTaylor L, Fitch N, Castle P, Watkins S, Aldous J, Sculthorpe N, Midgely A, Brewer J, Mauger A (2014) 'Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol', Frontiers in Physiology, 5en
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2014.00185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/623637
dc.description.abstractSoccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherFrontiersen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00185/fullen
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectfootballen
dc.subjectsocceren
dc.subjectheaten
dc.subjectcolden
dc.subjectC600 Sports Scienceen
dc.titleExposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocolen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of West of Scotlanden
dc.contributor.departmentEdge Hill Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Kenten
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Physiologyen
dc.date.updated2019-12-17T12:13:44Z
html.description.abstractSoccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fphys-05-00185.pdf
Size:
1.653Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF