Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
Authors
Taylor, LeeFitch, Natalie
Castle, Paul C.
Watkins, Samuel L.
Aldous, Jeffrey William Frederick
Sculthorpe, Nicholas
Midgely, Adrian
Brewer, John
Mauger, Alexis R.
Affiliation
University of BedfordshireUniversity of West Scotland
Edge Hill University
University of Kent
Issue Date
2014-05-20
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.Citation
Taylor L, Fitch N, Castle P, Watkins S, Aldous J, Sculthorpe N, Midgely A, Brewer J, Mauger A (2014) 'Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol', Frontiers in Physiology, 5Publisher
FrontiersJournal
Frontiers in PhysiologyAdditional Links
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00185/fullType
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1664-042Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fphys.2014.00185
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF