The development of age and disability equality within the European Union: the Court of Justice and the (mis)implementation of EU general principles
dc.contributor.author | Gualco, Elena | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-10T09:22:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-10T09:22:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gualco E (2019) 'The development of age and disability equality within the European Union: the Court of Justice and the (mis)implementation of EU general principles', Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 4, pp.979-998. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1720-4313 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17394/95736 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10547/623329 | |
dc.description.abstract | Over the years, EU general principles have proven to be an essential source of protection of equality. The approach followed by the European Court of Justice has made general principles one of the most effective sources of law towards the goal of expanding the protection of equality and improving its enforcement. Against this backdrop, the article argues that some recent decisions in the fields of disability and age discrimination challenge the merits of such approach and eventually disclose its shortcomings. The ruling in Kaltoft shows at time a lack of consistency of the CJEU case-law and a far too discretional reasoning, while Dansk Industri and Parris demonstrate that the Court’s arbitrary approach has the capacity to ultimately jeopardise the effective and fair enjoyment of equality as an individual right. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Il Mulino | en |
dc.relation.url | https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17394/95736 | |
dc.rights | Yellow - can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | European Union | en |
dc.subject | non-discrimination | en |
dc.subject | age discrimination | en |
dc.subject | Disability | en |
dc.subject | M120 European Union Law | en |
dc.title | The development of age and disability equality within the European Union: the Court of Justice and the (mis)implementation of EU general principles | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2612-2219 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-06-10T09:20:19Z | |
dc.description.note | Hi, if this is to be eligible for REF it needs to have a full text file attached - this cannot be the final pdf but could be the version after peer review but before publisher formatting applied. RVO 7/6/19 | |
html.description.abstract | Over the years, EU general principles have proven to be an essential source of protection of equality. The approach followed by the European Court of Justice has made general principles one of the most effective sources of law towards the goal of expanding the protection of equality and improving its enforcement. Against this backdrop, the article argues that some recent decisions in the fields of disability and age discrimination challenge the merits of such approach and eventually disclose its shortcomings. The ruling in Kaltoft shows at time a lack of consistency of the CJEU case-law and a far too discretional reasoning, while Dansk Industri and Parris demonstrate that the Court’s arbitrary approach has the capacity to ultimately jeopardise the effective and fair enjoyment of equality as an individual right. |