Evaluating the quality of social work supervision in UK children's services: comparing self-report and independent observations
Abstract
Understanding how different forms of supervision support good social work practice and improve outcomes for people who use services is nearly impossible without reliable and valid evaluative measures. Yet the question of how best to evaluate the quality of supervision in different contexts is a complicated and as-yet-unsolved challenge. In this study, we observed 12 social work supervisors in a simulated supervision session offering support and guidance to an actor playing the part of an inexperienced social worker facing a casework-related crisis. A team of researchers analyzed these sessions using a customized skills-based coding framework. In addition, 19 social workers completed a questionnaire about their supervision experiences as provided by the same 12 supervisors. According to the coding framework, the supervisors demonstrated relatively modest skill levels, and we found low correlations among different skills. In contrast, according to the questionnaire data, supervisors had relatively high skill levels, and we found high correlations among different skills. The findings imply that although self-report remains the simplest way to evaluate supervision quality, other approaches are possible and may provide a different perspective. However, developing a reliable independent measure of supervision quality remains a noteworthy challenge.Citation
Wilkins D, Khan M, Stabler L, Newlands F, Mcdonnell J (2018) 'Evaluating the quality of social work supervision in UK children's services: comparing self-report and independent observations', Clinical Social Work Journal, 46 (4), pp.350-360.Publisher
SpringerJournal
Clinical Social Work JournalPubMed ID
30524151PubMed Central ID
PMC6244969Additional Links
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10615-018-0680-7https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244969/
Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0091-1674ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s10615-018-0680-7
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Related articles
- Midwives and supervisors of midwives' perceptions of the statutory supervision of midwifery within the United Kingdom: a systematic review.
- Authors: Henshaw AM, Clarke D, Long AF
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
- Authors: Schor EL, American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family
- Issue date: 2003 Jun
- Initial experiences and innovations in supervising community health workers for maternal, newborn, and child health in Morogoro region, Tanzania.
- Authors: Roberton T, Applegate J, Lefevre AE, Mosha I, Cooper CM, Silverman M, Feldhaus I, Chebet JJ, Mpembeni R, Semu H, Killewo J, Winch P, Baqui AH, George AS
- Issue date: 2015 Apr 9
- The impact of a human resource management intervention on the capacity of supervisors to support and supervise their staff at health facility level.
- Authors: Uduma O, Galligan M, Mollel H, Masanja H, Bradley S, McAuliffe E
- Issue date: 2017 Aug 30
- Social constructionism and supervision: experiences of AAMFT supervisors and supervised therapists.
- Authors: Hair HJ, Fine M
- Issue date: 2012 Oct