Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRandhawa, Gurchen
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-02T13:06:14Z
dc.date.available2018-10-02T13:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-01
dc.identifier.citationRandhawa G. (2013) 'Policy perspectives: International survey of nephrologists' perceptions of and attitudes towards rewards and compensation for kidney donation', Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 28 (6), pp.1343-1345.en
dc.identifier.issn0931-0509
dc.identifier.pmid23780674
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ndt/gft075
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622904
dc.description.abstractThe challenge to resolve the gap between supply and demand for organs is a global phenomenon. The possible solutions can invariably involve a range of ethical and moral dilemmas. This is certainly the case when considering rewards and compensation for kidney donation. In their thought provoking study, Ghahramami et al. provide the perspectives of medical professionals on these issues. The views of nephrologists concerning rewards and compensation chime with views of the public, which have been highlighted in many previous studies. Rewards and compensation for organ donation are perceived, by some, as barriers to successful organ donation transplant programmes; whereas others view them as potential facilitators to increasing organ donation rates. It is interesting to note that two-thirds of survey respondents believe that introducing some kind of reward or offering compensation would lead to an increase in organ donation. This finding is not unique to this study and is evident in many public surveys where respondents have expressed a belief that offering some form of incentive would have a positive impact on organ donation rates. Disappointingly, the debates concerning the type of reward or compensation and its potential impact on donation rates continue to take place in a relatively 'evidence base-free' vacuum. What is abundantly clear is that many lives continue to be lost in many countries due to a lack of suitable organs for transplant. What is less clear is which forms of reward and compensation actually have an impact on donation rates and whether they positively impact the life experiences of donors, recipients and their families. This level of evidence- base is urgently required.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ndt/gft075en
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.subjectnephrologistsen
dc.subjectcompensationen
dc.subjectpolicyen
dc.subjectrewardsen
dc.subjectevidence-based policyen
dc.subjectorgan donationen
dc.subjectL510 Health & Welfareen
dc.titlePolicy perspectives: International survey of nephrologists' perceptions of and attitudes towards rewards and compensation for kidney donationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.identifier.journalNephrology Dialysis Transplantationen
dc.date.updated2018-10-02T12:38:56Z
html.description.abstractThe challenge to resolve the gap between supply and demand for organs is a global phenomenon. The possible solutions can invariably involve a range of ethical and moral dilemmas. This is certainly the case when considering rewards and compensation for kidney donation. In their thought provoking study, Ghahramami et al. provide the perspectives of medical professionals on these issues. The views of nephrologists concerning rewards and compensation chime with views of the public, which have been highlighted in many previous studies. Rewards and compensation for organ donation are perceived, by some, as barriers to successful organ donation transplant programmes; whereas others view them as potential facilitators to increasing organ donation rates. It is interesting to note that two-thirds of survey respondents believe that introducing some kind of reward or offering compensation would lead to an increase in organ donation. This finding is not unique to this study and is evident in many public surveys where respondents have expressed a belief that offering some form of incentive would have a positive impact on organ donation rates. Disappointingly, the debates concerning the type of reward or compensation and its potential impact on donation rates continue to take place in a relatively 'evidence base-free' vacuum. What is abundantly clear is that many lives continue to be lost in many countries due to a lack of suitable organs for transplant. What is less clear is which forms of reward and compensation actually have an impact on donation rates and whether they positively impact the life experiences of donors, recipients and their families. This level of evidence- base is urgently required.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record