Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSharp, Chloeen
dc.contributor.authorRandhawa, Gurchen
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-02T13:03:35Z
dc.date.available2018-10-02T13:03:35Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.identifier.citationSharp C., Randhawa G. (2014) 'Organ donation as an 'altruistic gift': Incentives and reciprocity in deceased organ donation from a UK Polish migrant perspective', Annals of Transplantation, 19 (1), pp.23-31.en
dc.identifier.issn1425-9524
dc.identifier.pmid24435076
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/AOT.889745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622903
dc.description.abstractBackground: Incentives and reciprocity have been widely debated within the literature as an alternative to altruism to motivate the public to register and consent to organ donation. This pilot study was the first to examine the views of the UK Polish migrant community toward these issues. Material and Methods: One-to-one and small group interviews were conducted in English and Polish to collect data. The interviews were recorded and transcribed and interviews in Polish were translated into English. All transcripts were coded, codes were grouped by theme and emergent themes were constantly compared to the new data until saturation. Results: Participants were motivated to donate altruistically but would accept reciprocity for organs once consent was given. Payment for organs was viewed as unfavourable but participants would accept contribution toward funeral expenses. Conclusions: Deceased organ donation was viewed as an ‘altruistic gift’. ‘Altruism’ and ‘gift’ are problematic in deceased organ donation and could explain the challenges that arise in the incentives and reciprocity debate. Mauss’s gift exchange theory could frame incentives as forming the ‘obligation to give’ and could encourage registration but could lead to coercion. Reciprocity could benefit families and be viewed as ‘fair’ and a token of gratitude.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was co-funded by NHS Blood and Transplant and the University of Bedfordshire.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.annalsoftransplantation.com/abstract/index/idArt/889745en
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPolish migrantsen
dc.subjectattitudesen
dc.subjectincentivesen
dc.subjectdeceased organ donationen
dc.subjectL510 Health & Welfareen
dc.titleOrgan donation as an 'altruistic gift': Incentives and reciprocity in deceased organ donation from a UK Polish migrant perspectiveen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.identifier.journalAnnals of Transplantationen
dc.date.updated2018-10-02T12:38:47Z
dc.description.note"This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially."
html.description.abstractBackground: Incentives and reciprocity have been widely debated within the literature as an alternative to altruism to motivate the public to register and consent to organ donation. This pilot study was the first to examine the views of the UK Polish migrant community toward these issues. Material and Methods: One-to-one and small group interviews were conducted in English and Polish to collect data. The interviews were recorded and transcribed and interviews in Polish were translated into English. All transcripts were coded, codes were grouped by theme and emergent themes were constantly compared to the new data until saturation. Results: Participants were motivated to donate altruistically but would accept reciprocity for organs once consent was given. Payment for organs was viewed as unfavourable but participants would accept contribution toward funeral expenses. Conclusions: Deceased organ donation was viewed as an ‘altruistic gift’. ‘Altruism’ and ‘gift’ are problematic in deceased organ donation and could explain the challenges that arise in the incentives and reciprocity debate. Mauss’s gift exchange theory could frame incentives as forming the ‘obligation to give’ and could encourage registration but could lead to coercion. Reciprocity could benefit families and be viewed as ‘fair’ and a token of gratitude.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
889745.pdf
Size:
362.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF