Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGualco, Elenaen
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T10:32:16Z
dc.date.available2018-07-03T10:32:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-26
dc.identifier.citationGualco E. (2017) '“Clash of Titans” 2.0. From conflicting EU general principles to conflicting jurisdictional authorities: the Court of Justice and the Danish Supreme Court in the Dansk Industri case', European Papers, 2 (1), pp.223-229.en
dc.identifier.issn2499-8249
dc.identifier.doi10.15166/2499-8249/124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622789
dc.description.abstractThe present papers focuses on the reception by the Danish Supreme Court of the CJEU decision in the Dansk Industri case. Instead of disapplying a national provision which was found by the CJEU to be inconsistent with the general principle of non-discrimination of grounds of age, the Danish Supreme Court stresses that the Law of Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark to the European Union does not cover general principles of EU law and the national provision cannot be disapplied. The selective approach of the Danish Supreme Court raises a number of concerns which this paper highlights: first, a clear misunderstanding regarding the functioning of general principles of EU law; second, a violation of the duty of sincere cooperation and the relate doctrine of supremacy of EU law; third, an arguable assessment of the effects of the Charter of fundamental rights.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/clash-of-titans-2-0-from-conflicting-eu-general-principles-to-conflicting-jurisdictional-authoritiesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.subjectinternational lawen
dc.subjectlawen
dc.subjectEU lawen
dc.subjectM120 European Union Lawen
dc.title“Clash of Titans” 2.0. From conflicting EU general principles to conflicting jurisdictional authorities: the Court of Justice and the Danish Supreme Court in the Dansk Industri caseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Papersen
dc.date.updated2018-07-03T09:07:20Z
dc.description.note"All the works published on European Papers (e-Journal and European Forum) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License."
html.description.abstractThe present papers focuses on the reception by the Danish Supreme Court of the CJEU decision in the Dansk Industri case. Instead of disapplying a national provision which was found by the CJEU to be inconsistent with the general principle of non-discrimination of grounds of age, the Danish Supreme Court stresses that the Law of Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark to the European Union does not cover general principles of EU law and the national provision cannot be disapplied. The selective approach of the Danish Supreme Court raises a number of concerns which this paper highlights: first, a clear misunderstanding regarding the functioning of general principles of EU law; second, a violation of the duty of sincere cooperation and the relate doctrine of supremacy of EU law; third, an arguable assessment of the effects of the Charter of fundamental rights.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
EP_eJ_2017_1_15_Insight_Elena_ ...
Size:
143.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/