Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrice, Lindaen
dc.contributor.authorKirkwood, Adrianen
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-18T11:02:37Z
dc.date.available2018-04-18T11:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-11
dc.identifier.citationPrice L, Kirkwood A (2014) 'Informed design of educational technology for teaching and learning? Towards an evidence-informed model of good practice', Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23 (3), pp.325-347.en
dc.identifier.issn1475-939X
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1475939X.2014.942749
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622603
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to model evidence-informed design based on a selective critical analysis of research articles. We draw upon findings from an investigation into practitioners? use of educational technologies to synthesise and model what informs their designs. We found that practitioners? designs were often driven by implicit assumptions about learning. These shaped both the design of interventions and the methods sought to derive evaluations and interpret the findings. We argue that interventions need to be grounded in better and explicit conceptualisations of what constitutes learning in order to have well-informed designs that focus on improving the quality of student learning.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1475939X.2014.942749en
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.subjectlearning technologyen
dc.subjectteaching and learningen
dc.titleInformed design of educational technology for teaching and learning? Towards an evidence-informed model of good practiceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentOpen Universityen
dc.identifier.journalTechnology, Pedagogy and Educationen
dc.date.updated2018-04-17T13:56:30Z
dc.description.noteSpecial Issue: Informed Design of Educational Technologies
html.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to model evidence-informed design based on a selective critical analysis of research articles. We draw upon findings from an investigation into practitioners? use of educational technologies to synthesise and model what informs their designs. We found that practitioners? designs were often driven by implicit assumptions about learning. These shaped both the design of interventions and the methods sought to derive evaluations and interpret the findings. We argue that interventions need to be grounded in better and explicit conceptualisations of what constitutes learning in order to have well-informed designs that focus on improving the quality of student learning.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record