The role of gender in students’ ratings of teaching quality in computer science and environmental engineering
dc.contributor.author | Price, Linda | en |
dc.contributor.author | Svensson, Ingrid | en |
dc.contributor.author | Borell, Jonas | en |
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, John T.E. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-27T10:56:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-27T10:56:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Price, L., Svensson, I., Borell, J., Richardson, J.T.E. (2017) 'The role of gender in students’ ratings of teaching quality in computer science and environmental engineering', IEEE Transactions on Education, 60 (4), pp.281-287. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-9359 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/TE.2017.2696904 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622567 | |
dc.description.abstract | Students’ ratings of teaching quality on course units in computer science and environmental engineering at a large Swedish university were obtained using the Course Experience Questionnaire; 8,888 sets of ratings were obtained from men and 4,280 sets were obtained from women over ten academic years. There were differences in the ratings given by students taking the two programs; in particular, teachers tended to receive higher ratings in subjects that were less typical for their gender than in subjects that were more typical for their gender. There were differences in the ratings given to male and female teachers, differences in the ratings given by male and female students, and interactions between these two effects. There was no systematic trend for students to give different ratings to teachers of the same gender as themselves compared with teachers of the other gender. Nevertheless, without exception even the statistically significant effects were small in magnitude and unlikely to be of theoretical or practical importance. It is concluded that the causes of differences in the career progression of male and female teachers in engineering education need to be sought elsewhere. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) | en |
dc.relation.url | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7918606/?reload=true | en |
dc.rights | Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | gender | en |
dc.subject | computer science | en |
dc.subject | engineering students | en |
dc.subject | environmental engineering | en |
dc.subject | teaching evaluations | en |
dc.title | The role of gender in students’ ratings of teaching quality in computer science and environmental engineering | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1557-9638 | |
dc.identifier.journal | IEEE Transactions on Education | en |
dc.date.updated | 2018-03-27T10:50:28Z | |
dc.description.note | Sherpa romeo has "authors may post author's post-print version on funder's designated repository or institutional repository, an embargo of 0 months to 24 months may be required" but gives no indication what that embargo might be, no info on IEEE site. 26/3/18 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-03-09T09:24:29Z | |
html.description.abstract | Students’ ratings of teaching quality on course units in computer science and environmental engineering at a large Swedish university were obtained using the Course Experience Questionnaire; 8,888 sets of ratings were obtained from men and 4,280 sets were obtained from women over ten academic years. There were differences in the ratings given by students taking the two programs; in particular, teachers tended to receive higher ratings in subjects that were less typical for their gender than in subjects that were more typical for their gender. There were differences in the ratings given to male and female teachers, differences in the ratings given by male and female students, and interactions between these two effects. There was no systematic trend for students to give different ratings to teachers of the same gender as themselves compared with teachers of the other gender. Nevertheless, without exception even the statistically significant effects were small in magnitude and unlikely to be of theoretical or practical importance. It is concluded that the causes of differences in the career progression of male and female teachers in engineering education need to be sought elsewhere. |