Authors
White, Adam JohnBatten, John
Robinson, Stefan
Anderson, Eric
Burns, Andrew
Batey, Jo
Ryan-Stewart, Helen
Discombe, Russell
Issue Date
2018-01-14Subjects
C600 Sports Sciencehealth
L510 Health & Welfare
health and physical education
rugby
tackling
physical education
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the United Kingdom [1]. This is because (a) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (b) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (c) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (d) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby [2]. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm’ [3]. Yet, the notion of risk (un) acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here [4].Citation
White AJ, Batten J, Robinson S, Anderson E, Burns A, Batey J, Ryan-Stewart H, Discombe R (2018) 'Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?', Injury Prevention 24 (2) 114-115.Publisher
BMJJournal
Injury PreventionPubMed ID
29363589Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1353-8047ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042672
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF