Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRowinski, Paulen
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T12:13:38Z
dc.date.available2017-11-27T12:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-18
dc.identifier.citationRowinski, P. (2016) 'Mind the gap: the language of prejudice and the press omissions that led a people to the precipice', in Jackson D, Thorsen E, Wring D. (ed(s).). EU referendum analysis 2016: media, voters and the campaign, London.: University of Bournemouth, Loughborough University, Political Studies Association. p. 32.en
dc.identifier.isbn9781910042083
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622409
dc.description.abstractA pervasive Euroscepticism has now reached its zenith, drawing on a collective memory, borne of the moment we chose to be a good friend of post-war Europe – but not part of it. As the UK eventually joined, unable to influence the project’s direction, we have never fully understood what the pooling of sovereignty nor belonging to the club mean. The projection of Europe in the collective memory, reinforced by seldom articulated facts (by either politicians or press) has resulted in an ‘other’, based less on a grasp of the reality and more a common-sense understanding. Neither the political class nor the mainstream press has ever confronted the cultural presuppositions of a British past never really harnessed to a European future.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Bournemouth, Loughborough University, Political Studies Association.en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.referendumanalysis.euen
dc.subjectEuroscepticismen
dc.subjectEU referendumen
dc.subjectBrexiten
dc.subjectL241 European Union Politicsen
dc.titleMind the gap: the language of prejudice and the press omissions that led a people to the precipiceen
dc.title.alternativeEU referendum analysis 2016: media, voters and the campaignen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.date.updated2017-11-27T11:22:56Z
dc.description.notefull text not required for REF so passing metadata only
html.description.abstractA pervasive Euroscepticism has now reached its zenith, drawing on a collective memory, borne of the moment we chose to be a good friend of post-war Europe – but not part of it. As the UK eventually joined, unable to influence the project’s direction, we have never fully understood what the pooling of sovereignty nor belonging to the club mean. The projection of Europe in the collective memory, reinforced by seldom articulated facts (by either politicians or press) has resulted in an ‘other’, based less on a grasp of the reality and more a common-sense understanding. Neither the political class nor the mainstream press has ever confronted the cultural presuppositions of a British past never really harnessed to a European future.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record