Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaltag, Crinaen
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-09T11:56:43Z
dc.date.available2017-10-09T11:56:43Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-01
dc.identifier.citationBaltag C. (2017) 'Not hot enough: cooling-off periods and the recent developments under the Energy Charter Treaty', Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 6 (1), pp.190-196.en
dc.identifier.issn2320-2815
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622271
dc.description.abstractCooling-off provisions in international investment agreements guarantee that investors and host States resolve their disputes in the most efficient manner. Aimed at offering the parties the opportunity to amicably settle their differences, cooling-off provisions remain a controversial issue in the jurisprudence on international arbitral tribunals. Arbitral tribunals are still split between considering the cooling-off provision as a procedural requirement or as an admissibility or jurisdictional requirement. Each of these positions triggers different practical consequences, with serious outcomes for the arbitral process.This note addresses the latest developments concerning the cooling-off provision under one international investment agreement–the Energy Charter Treaty.
dc.description.sponsorshipn/aen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNational Law University, Jodhpuren
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ijal.in/sites/default/files/IJAL Volume 6_Issue 1_Crina Baltag.pdfen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectinvestment treaty arbitrationen
dc.subjectinternational arbitrationen
dc.subjectenergyen
dc.subjectM290 Law by topic not elsewhere classifieden
dc.titleNot hot enough: cooling-off periods and the recent developments under the Energy Charter Treatyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalIndian Journal of Arbitration Lawen
dc.date.updated2017-10-09T11:39:26Z
dc.description.noteopen access
html.description.abstractCooling-off provisions in international investment agreements guarantee that investors and host States resolve their disputes in the most efficient manner. Aimed at offering the parties the opportunity to amicably settle their differences, cooling-off provisions remain a controversial issue in the jurisprudence on international arbitral tribunals. Arbitral tribunals are still split between considering the cooling-off provision as a procedural requirement or as an admissibility or jurisdictional requirement. Each of these positions triggers different practical consequences, with serious outcomes for the arbitral process.This note addresses the latest developments concerning the cooling-off provision under one international investment agreement–the Energy Charter Treaty.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
IJALVolume6_Issue1_CrinaBaltag.pdf
Size:
143.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/