Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaplin, Aishaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-21T13:48:44Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-21T13:48:44Zen
dc.date.issued2009-06en
dc.identifier.citationTaplin, A. (2009) 'Promoting reciprocal relationships—examining the ‘give and take’ in Social Science research'.Twenty-First Century Society 4 (2):229en
dc.identifier.issn1745-0144en
dc.identifier.issn1745-0152en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17450140903000332en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/594514en
dc.description.abstractThe focus of this paper is on how international Social Work research can respond to critiques of western Social Science research with Third World women. Drawing on recent fieldwork experiences with young women in Mozambique, it examines the power relationships that are inherent in the ‘give and take’ between researchers and participants. Questions such as ‘who gave what?’ and ‘who took what?’ are at the forefront of its concerns. Although the research resulted in minimal material benefit for the participants, the two-way exchange documented builds a more complex picture than one in which participants do all of the ‘giving’ and researchers all the ‘taking’. The paper concludes by suggesting that while the ‘Southern’ context compels particular attention to the ‘give and take’ relationship, it is also pertinent to ‘Northern’ contexts.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17450140903000332en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Twenty-First Century Societyen
dc.subjectresearchen
dc.subjectsocial scienceen
dc.titlePromoting reciprocal relationships—examining the ‘give and take’ in Social Science researchen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Southamptonen
dc.identifier.journalTwenty-First Century Societyen
html.description.abstractThe focus of this paper is on how international Social Work research can respond to critiques of western Social Science research with Third World women. Drawing on recent fieldwork experiences with young women in Mozambique, it examines the power relationships that are inherent in the ‘give and take’ between researchers and participants. Questions such as ‘who gave what?’ and ‘who took what?’ are at the forefront of its concerns. Although the research resulted in minimal material benefit for the participants, the two-way exchange documented builds a more complex picture than one in which participants do all of the ‘giving’ and researchers all the ‘taking’. The paper concludes by suggesting that while the ‘Southern’ context compels particular attention to the ‘give and take’ relationship, it is also pertinent to ‘Northern’ contexts.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record