Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLang, Richarden
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-21T12:01:07Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-21T12:01:07Zen
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationLang, R. (2013) 'The EU's new victims' rights directive: can minimum harmonization work for a concept like vulnerability?'. Nottingham law journal 22 90-103en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/594479en
dc.description.abstractThis is a conceptual piece. It is also, to use the latest pedagogical jargon, a reflective piece. It arose from a project which the author undertook with the National Centre for Cyberstalking Research at the University of Bedfordshire in 2012, lobbying for an explicit mention of cyberstalking in what was then the draft Victims’ Rights Directive.1
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNottingham Trent Universityen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ntu.ac.uk/nls/document_uploads/142654.pdfen
dc.subjectvictim's rightsen
dc.subjectVictims’ Rights Directiveen
dc.subjectvulnerabilityen
dc.titleThe EU's new victims' rights directive: can minimum harmonization work for a concept like vulnerability?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalNottingham Law Journalen
html.description.abstractThis is a conceptual piece. It is also, to use the latest pedagogical jargon, a reflective piece. It arose from a project which the author undertook with the National Centre for Cyberstalking Research at the University of Bedfordshire in 2012, lobbying for an explicit mention of cyberstalking in what was then the draft Victims’ Rights Directive.1


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Centre for Research in Law (CRiL)
    CRiL developing research activities in the areas of Law and Terrorism, Investment Treaty Arbitration, International Commercial Arbitration and Aviation Law.
  • Law

Show simple item record