A DST-based approach for construction project risk analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Taroun, Abdulmaten | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, J.B. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-18T13:15:21Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-18T13:15:21Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-04-03 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Taroun, A., Yang, J.B. (2013) 'A DST-based approach for construction project risk analysis' Journal of the Operational Research Society 64 (8):1221 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0160-5682 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1476-9360 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1057/jors.2013.38 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10547/593714 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Despite its huge potential in risk analysis, the Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence (DST) has not received enough attention in construction management. This paper presents a DST-based approach for structuring personal experience and professional judgment when assessing construction project risk. DST was innovatively used to tackle the problem of lacking sufficient information through enabling analysts to provide incomplete assessments. Risk cost is used as a common scale for measuring risk impact on the various project objectives, and the Evidential Reasoning algorithm is suggested as a novel alternative for aggregating individual assessments. A spreadsheet-based decision support system (DSS) was devised to facilitate the proposed approach. Four case studies were conducted to examine the approach's viability. Senior managers in four British construction companies tried the DSS and gave very promising feedback. The paper concludes that the proposed methodology may contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice of construction risk assessment. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Palgrave MacMillan | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/jors.2013.38 | en |
| dc.rights | Archived with thanks to Journal of the Operational Research Society | en |
| dc.subject | Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence | en |
| dc.subject | risk analysis | en |
| dc.subject | construction | en |
| dc.title | A DST-based approach for construction project risk analysis | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.contributor.department | University of Bedfordshire | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | Journal of the Operational Research Society | en |
| html.description.abstract | Despite its huge potential in risk analysis, the Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence (DST) has not received enough attention in construction management. This paper presents a DST-based approach for structuring personal experience and professional judgment when assessing construction project risk. DST was innovatively used to tackle the problem of lacking sufficient information through enabling analysts to provide incomplete assessments. Risk cost is used as a common scale for measuring risk impact on the various project objectives, and the Evidential Reasoning algorithm is suggested as a novel alternative for aggregating individual assessments. A spreadsheet-based decision support system (DSS) was devised to facilitate the proposed approach. Four case studies were conducted to examine the approach's viability. Senior managers in four British construction companies tried the DSS and gave very promising feedback. The paper concludes that the proposed methodology may contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice of construction risk assessment. |