A new approach to managing patients with problematic metal hip implants: the use of an Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team meeting
Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Over one million patients worldwide are estimated to have a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. To improve the management of these patients and reduce surgeon uncertainty regarding decision-making, we designed an Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team (iMDT) working approach. Methods: From August 2012 to April 2014, the iMDT discussed 215 patients with 266 metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Of these, 236 primary arthroplasties (132 hip resurfacing and 104 total hip) were analyzed. The remaining thirty cases involved problematic revised hips and were therefore excluded. The possible recommendations of the iMDT were monitoring, further investigation, or surgery. The concordance between the recommendation and the actual management was used to assess the usefulness of this approach in reducing uncertainty in surgeon-level decision-making. Results: The median Oxford Hip Score was 35 (range, 4 to 48), and median cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood were 3.54 ppb (range, 0.18 to 161.46 ppb) and 3.17 ppb (range, 0.20 to 100.67 ppb), respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed abductor muscle atrophy in ninety-two (39%) of the hips and a pseudotumor in eighty (34%). The iMDT recommended monitoring of 146 (61.9%) of the hips, further investigation of thirty (12.7%), and surgery in sixty (25.4%). The actual outcome was concordant with the recommendation in 211 (91.7%) of the hips. Conclusions: Our iMDT approach to the metal-on-metal hip burden combines the tacit knowledge of an expert panel, regulatory guidance, and up-to-date evidence to improve decision-making among surgeons. The high level of concordance between the recommendation and the actual outcome, combined with the feasibility of the methods used, suggest that this method effectively reduces uncertainty among surgeons and may lead to improved patient outcomes.
CitationBerber, R., Pappas, Y., Khoo, M., Miles, J., Carrington, R., Skinner, J., Hart A. (2015) 'A New Approach to Managing Patients with Problematic Metal Hip Implants: The Use of an Internet-Enhanced Multidisciplinary Team Meeting'. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 97(4), e20.
- Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.
- Authors: Lainiala O, Reito A, Elo P, Pajamäki J, Puolakka T, Eskelinen A
- Issue date: 2015 Jul
- Muscle atrophy and metal-on-metal hip implants: a serial MRI study of 74 hips.
- Authors: Berber R, Khoo M, Cook E, Guppy A, Hua J, Miles J, Carrington R, Skinner J, Hart A
- Issue date: 2015 Jun
- Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection.
- Authors: Hart AJ, Matthies A, Henckel J, Ilo K, Skinner J, Noble PC
- Issue date: 2012 Feb 15
- The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
- Authors: Matharu GS, Berryman F, Brash L, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB, Dunlop DJ
- Issue date: 2016 Apr 20
- Comprehensive Analysis of a Recalled Modular Total Hip System and Recommendations for Management.
- Authors: Nawabi DH, Do HT, Ruel A, Lurie B, Elpers ME, Wright T, Potter HG, Westrich GH
- Issue date: 2016 Jan 6