Shareholder primacy and stakeholders’ interests in the aftermath of a takeover: a review of empirical evidence
dc.contributor.author | Nyombi, Chrispas | en |
dc.contributor.author | Mortimer, Tom | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, Rhidian | en |
dc.contributor.author | Zouridakis, Georgios | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-29T13:38:05Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-29T13:38:05Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2015-03 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Nyombi, C., Mortimer, T. Lewis, R. and Zouridakis, G (2015) 'Shareholder primacy and stakeholders’ interests in the aftermath of a takeover: a review of empirical evidence' International Business Law Journal, 2, pp161-186 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1777-5655 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10547/578882 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Since the takeover of Cadbury Plc in 2010, there has been increased academic attention on investor short-termism during takeovers and whether the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule has made it easy to acquire UK companies. This paper contributes to this growing body of research by examining existing empirical studies to determine whether concerns over short-termism and the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule are justified. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell | en |
dc.relation.url | http://ssrn.com/abstract=2645086 | en |
dc.relation.url | https://www.iblj.com/abstract.htm?lg=en&ref=22015161-186 | en |
dc.subject | takeovers | en |
dc.subject | employment | en |
dc.subject | Board Neutrality Rule | en |
dc.subject | Takeover Code 2006 | en |
dc.subject | Cadbury | en |
dc.subject | Kraft | en |
dc.subject | Rule 21 | en |
dc.title | Shareholder primacy and stakeholders’ interests in the aftermath of a takeover: a review of empirical evidence | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | University of Bedfordshire | en |
dc.contributor.department | University of Essex | en |
dc.identifier.journal | International Business Law Journal | en |
html.description.abstract | Since the takeover of Cadbury Plc in 2010, there has been increased academic attention on investor short-termism during takeovers and whether the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule has made it easy to acquire UK companies. This paper contributes to this growing body of research by examining existing empirical studies to determine whether concerns over short-termism and the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule are justified. |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Centre for Research in Law (CRiL)
CRiL developing research activities in the areas of Law and Terrorism, Investment Treaty Arbitration, International Commercial Arbitration and Aviation Law. -
Law