Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyombi, Chrispasen
dc.contributor.authorMortimer, Tomen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Rhidianen
dc.contributor.authorZouridakis, Georgiosen
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-29T13:38:05Zen
dc.date.available2015-09-29T13:38:05Zen
dc.date.issued2015-03en
dc.identifier.citationNyombi, C., Mortimer, T. Lewis, R. and Zouridakis, G (2015) 'Shareholder primacy and stakeholders’ interests in the aftermath of a takeover: a review of empirical evidence' International Business Law Journal, 2, pp161-186en
dc.identifier.issn1777-5655en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/578882en
dc.description.abstractSince the takeover of Cadbury Plc in 2010, there has been increased academic attention on investor short-termism during takeovers and whether the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule has made it easy to acquire UK companies. This paper contributes to this growing body of research by examining existing empirical studies to determine whether concerns over short-termism and the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule are justified.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen
dc.relation.urlhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2645086en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.iblj.com/abstract.htm?lg=en&ref=22015161-186en
dc.subjecttakeoversen
dc.subjectemploymenten
dc.subjectBoard Neutrality Ruleen
dc.subjectTakeover Code 2006en
dc.subjectCadburyen
dc.subjectKraften
dc.subjectRule 21en
dc.titleShareholder primacy and stakeholders’ interests in the aftermath of a takeover: a review of empirical evidenceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Essexen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Business Law Journalen
html.description.abstractSince the takeover of Cadbury Plc in 2010, there has been increased academic attention on investor short-termism during takeovers and whether the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule has made it easy to acquire UK companies. This paper contributes to this growing body of research by examining existing empirical studies to determine whether concerns over short-termism and the continued imposition of the board neutrality rule are justified.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Centre for Research in Law (CRiL)
    CRiL developing research activities in the areas of Law and Terrorism, Investment Treaty Arbitration, International Commercial Arbitration and Aviation Law.
  • Law

Show simple item record