• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • IHR Institute for Health Research - to April 2016
    • IHR Institute for Health Research
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • IHR Institute for Health Research - to April 2016
    • IHR Institute for Health Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UOBREPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutLearning ResourcesResearch Graduate SchoolResearch InstitutesUniversity Website

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: A study using the NJR dataset

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Pappas+Y+Bone+and+Joint+2015.pdf
    Size:
    556.6Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    final version
    Download
    Authors
    Sabah, S.A.
    Henckel, J.
    Cook, Erica Jane
    Whittaker, R.
    Hothi, H.
    Pappas, Yannis
    Blunn, G.
    Skinner, John
    Hart, Alister
    Affiliation
    Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital
    Hillingdon Hospital
    University of Bedfordshire
    University College London Hospitals
    Issue Date
    2015-01-07
    Subjects
    hip arthroplasty
    joint replacement
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Arthroplasty registries are important for the surveillance of joint replacements and the evaluation of outcome. Independent validation of registry data ensures high quality. The ability for orthopaedic implant retrieval centres to validate registry data is not known. We analysed data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (NJR) for primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties performed between 2003 and 2013. Records were linked to the London Implant Retrieval Centre (RC) for validation. A total of 67 045 procedures on the NJR and 782 revised pairs of components from the RC were included. We were able to link 476 procedures (60.9%) recorded with the RC to the NJR successfully. However, 306 procedures (39.1%) could not be linked. The outcome recorded by the NJR (as either revised, unrevised or death) for a primary procedure was incorrect in 79 linked cases (16.6%). The rate of registry-retrieval linkage and correct assignment of outcome code improved over time. The rates of error for component reference numbers on the NJR were as follows: femoral head category number 14/229 (5.0%); femoral head batch number 13/232 (5.3%); acetabular component category number 2/293 (0.7%) and acetabular component batch number 24/347 (6.5%). Registry-retrieval linkage provided a novel means for the validation of data, particularly for component fields. This study suggests that NJR reports may underestimate rates of revision for many types of metal-on-metal hip replacement. This is topical given the increasing scope for NJR data. We recommend a system for continuous independent evaluation of the quality and validity of NJR data. Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: A study using the NJR dataset (PDF Download Available).
    Citation
    Sabah, S.A., Henckel, J., Cook, E., Whittaker, R., Hothi, H., Pappas, Y., Blunn, G., Skinner, J., Hart, A. (2015) 'Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: A study using the NJR dataset' The Bone & Joint Journal 97-B (1):10
    Publisher
    British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Journal
    The Bone & Joint Journal
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10547/558777
    DOI
    10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.35279
    PubMed ID
    25568407
    PubMed Central ID
    PMC4548488
    Additional Links
    https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/full/10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.35279
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548488/
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    2049-4394
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.35279
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    IHR Institute for Health Research

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Are all metal-on-metal hip revision operations contributing to the National Joint Registry implant survival curves? : a study comparing the London Implant Retrieval Centre and National Joint Registry datasets.
    • Authors: Sabah SA, Henckel J, Koutsouris S, Rajani R, Hothi H, Skinner JA, Hart AJ
    • Issue date: 2016 Jan
    • Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    • Authors: Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Howard PW, Blom AW, National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    • Issue date: 2012 Nov 17
    • Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    • Authors: Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Porter ML, Deehan DJ, Reed MR
    • Issue date: 2012 Jun
    • Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    • Authors: de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC
    • Issue date: 2011 Dec 21
    • Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    • Authors: Matharu GS, Judge A, Murray DW, Pandit HG
    • Issue date: 2018 Feb
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.