Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott, Graham G.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorSereno, Sara C.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Patrick J.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-06T12:32:01Z
dc.date.available2012-11-06T12:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.citationScott G., Sereno S. and O’Donnell P. (2012) 'Is a Mean Machine Better than a Dependable Drive? It's Geared Toward Your Regulatory Focus', Frontiers in Psychology 3:268.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.pmid22891062
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/251192
dc.description.abstractWhile many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message's component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413181/en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268/full
dc.subjectemotionen_GB
dc.subjectwordsen_GB
dc.subjectmessagesen_GB
dc.subjectregulatory focusen_GB
dc.subjectattitude changeen_GB
dc.titleIs a mean machine better than a dependable drive? it's geared toward your regulatory focusen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_GB
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in psychologyen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3413181
html.description.abstractWhile many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message's component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fpsyg-03-00268.pdf
Size:
1.086Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Full article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record