Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSheard, Peter W.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Paul M.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorPaine, Tim J.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T06:49:22Z
dc.date.available2012-05-21T06:49:22Z
dc.date.issued2009-10
dc.identifier.citationSheard, P.W., Smith, P.M., Paine, T.J. (2009) 'Athlete compliance to therapist requested contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation', Manual therapy 14 (5):539-43en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1532-2769
dc.identifier.pmid18996733
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.math.2008.08.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/224837
dc.description.abstractContraction intensities between 10 and 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) have been proposed in varying muscle energy technique (MET) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) post-isometric relaxation (PIR) protocols. The current study was undertaken to determine if athletes were able to comply with differing therapist requested contraction intensities during (PNF) stretching protocols. Thirty-six university athletes were recruited and MVC was established at hip extension, hip adduction, and horizontal shoulder adduction. Target PIR contractions were set at 20, 50 and 100% MVC and monitored throughout the contractions with a strain gauge dynamometer. Athletes were not able to match the target contraction values at 20 and 100% MVC (P< or =0.001). When examined for consistency across the three component contractions within each of the three PIR protocols, the athletes demonstrated widely variable scores (coefficient of variation (CV)=23.2-36.4% at 20% MVC; CV=19.3-29.4% at 50% MVC; and, CV=9.4-14.5% at 100% MVC). Our findings indicate that this group of athletes displayed a poor level of compliance to varying therapist requested contraction intensities with respect to both accuracy and consistency.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X08001410?via%3Dihuben_GB
dc.subjectC600 Sports Scienceen_GB
dc.subjectsports therapyen_GB
dc.subjectmanual therapyen_GB
dc.subjectproprioceptive neuromuscular facilitationen_GB
dc.subjectstretchingen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshBiomechanics
dc.subject.meshElectromyography
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIsometric Contraction
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMuscle Stretching Exercises
dc.subject.meshMuscle, Skeletal
dc.subject.meshPhysical Endurance
dc.subject.meshProprioception
dc.subject.meshReference Values
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.titleAthlete compliance to therapist requested contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_GB
dc.identifier.journalManual Therapyen_GB
html.description.abstractContraction intensities between 10 and 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) have been proposed in varying muscle energy technique (MET) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) post-isometric relaxation (PIR) protocols. The current study was undertaken to determine if athletes were able to comply with differing therapist requested contraction intensities during (PNF) stretching protocols. Thirty-six university athletes were recruited and MVC was established at hip extension, hip adduction, and horizontal shoulder adduction. Target PIR contractions were set at 20, 50 and 100% MVC and monitored throughout the contractions with a strain gauge dynamometer. Athletes were not able to match the target contraction values at 20 and 100% MVC (P< or =0.001). When examined for consistency across the three component contractions within each of the three PIR protocols, the athletes demonstrated widely variable scores (coefficient of variation (CV)=23.2-36.4% at 20% MVC; CV=19.3-29.4% at 50% MVC; and, CV=9.4-14.5% at 100% MVC). Our findings indicate that this group of athletes displayed a poor level of compliance to varying therapist requested contraction intensities with respect to both accuracy and consistency.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record