Athlete compliance to therapist requested contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
University of BedfordshireIssue Date
2009-10Subjects
C600 Sports Sciencesports therapy
manual therapy
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
stretching
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Contraction intensities between 10 and 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) have been proposed in varying muscle energy technique (MET) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) post-isometric relaxation (PIR) protocols. The current study was undertaken to determine if athletes were able to comply with differing therapist requested contraction intensities during (PNF) stretching protocols. Thirty-six university athletes were recruited and MVC was established at hip extension, hip adduction, and horizontal shoulder adduction. Target PIR contractions were set at 20, 50 and 100% MVC and monitored throughout the contractions with a strain gauge dynamometer. Athletes were not able to match the target contraction values at 20 and 100% MVC (P< or =0.001). When examined for consistency across the three component contractions within each of the three PIR protocols, the athletes demonstrated widely variable scores (coefficient of variation (CV)=23.2-36.4% at 20% MVC; CV=19.3-29.4% at 50% MVC; and, CV=9.4-14.5% at 100% MVC). Our findings indicate that this group of athletes displayed a poor level of compliance to varying therapist requested contraction intensities with respect to both accuracy and consistency.Citation
Sheard, P.W., Smith, P.M., Paine, T.J. (2009) 'Athlete compliance to therapist requested contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation', Manual therapy 14 (5):539-43Publisher
ElsevierJournal
Manual TherapyPubMed ID
18996733Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1532-2769ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.math.2008.08.006
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and static stretching on maximal voluntary contraction.
- Authors: Miyahara Y, Naito H, Ogura Y, Katamoto S, Aoki J
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- Optimal contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for maximal increase of range of motion.
- Authors: Sheard PW, Paine TJ
- Issue date: 2010 Feb
- Effect of submaximal contraction intensity in contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.
- Authors: Feland JB, Marin HN
- Issue date: 2004 Aug
- Changes in soleus motoneuron pool reflex excitability and surface EMG parameters during fatiguing low- vs. high-intensity isometric contractions.
- Authors: Pääsuke M, Rannama L, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H, Oöpik V
- Issue date: 2007 Nov-Dec
- Uninvolved versus target muscle contraction during contract: relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.
- Authors: Azevedo DC, Melo RM, Alves Corrêa RV, Chalmers G
- Issue date: 2011 Aug