Optimal contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for maximal increase of range of motion.
AffiliationUniversity of Bedfordshire
SubjectsC600 Sports Science
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractSheard, PW and Paine, TJ. Optimal contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for maximal increase of range of motion. J Strength Cond Res 24(2): 416-421, 2010-An informal review of literature on the use of postisometric relaxation (PIR) type proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) indicates that the force of contraction requested from the athlete ranges from 10 to 100% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). The purpose of this study was therefore to determine if an optimal contraction intensity to elicit maximum positive change in range of motion (ΔROM) exists. This research question was tested across a convenience sample of 56 (37 male and 19 female) university athletes. Target contractions during PNF interventions were set at 20, 50, and 100% MVIC. Pre- and post-PNF intervention hip flexion range of motion (ROM) was measured on a unilateral straight leg raise. The target MVIC of 20, 50, and 100% elicited mean pre-post intervention ΔROM of 8.4, 12.9, and 11.6°, respectively (all p ≤ 0.0001). Differences in pre-post intervention ΔROM between target contraction intensities were also significant (p = 0.016 to ≤ 0.0001). A peak ΔROM of 13.3° was found at a PNF contraction intensity of 64.3% MVIC. Where optimizing increased ROM in healthy athletes is the desired outcome of PIR-PNF application, coaches and trainers should elicit contraction intensities of approximately 65% MVIC.
CitationSheard, P.W., Paine, T.J. (2010) 'Optimal contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for maximal increase of range of motion', Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 24 (2):416-21
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research / National Strength & Conditioning Association
- Athlete compliance to therapist requested contraction intensity during proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.
- Authors: Sheard PW, Smith PM, Paine TJ
- Issue date: 2009 Oct
- Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and static stretching on maximal voluntary contraction.
- Authors: Miyahara Y, Naito H, Ogura Y, Katamoto S, Aoki J
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- A comparison of assisted and unassisted proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and static stretching.
- Authors: Maddigan ME, Peach AA, Behm DG
- Issue date: 2012 May
- Uninvolved versus target muscle contraction during contract: relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.
- Authors: Azevedo DC, Melo RM, Alves Corrêa RV, Chalmers G
- Issue date: 2011 Aug
- Effect of submaximal contraction intensity in contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.
- Authors: Feland JB, Marin HN
- Issue date: 2004 Aug