Unlocking the first protocol: protection of property and the European Court of Human Rights
AffiliationUniversity of Bedfordshire
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThis output makes an important contribution to an area where there is surprisingly little existing literature. Via a thorough analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence on Article 1 of Protocol No 1 (the relevant provision), the piece offers a highly original take on the Court’s case-law on this subject, ending with an algorithm that, it is hoped, will aid practitioners embarking on a case involving the right to property. However, other academics should also find it of interest. With the Yukos case – reputedly the largest expropriation case in legal history - having had its first hearing only a few months ago, the topic will only grow in importance as time goes on. The author also points out some of the differences between Article 1 of Protocol No 1 and the right to property provision in the new EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which only became legally binding in December 2009. As case-law based on the Charter starts to emerge from the Luxembourg Court (on terrorist asset-freezing, for example), again this topic is likely to gain prominence, with this output hopefully acting as a point of departure for future works by other scholars.
CitationLang, R. (2008) 'Unlocking the First Protocol: Protection of property and the European Court of Human Rights', Human Rights Law Journal 29, 205
PublisherN. P. Engel, Kehl am Rhein
JournalHuman Rights Law Journal
The following license files are associated with this item: