Learning-oriented language test preparation materials: a contradiction in terms?

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622430
Title:
Learning-oriented language test preparation materials: a contradiction in terms?
Authors:
Green, Anthony ( 0000-0003-4893-1798 )
Abstract:
The impact of the use of assessment on teaching and learning is increasingly regarded as a key concern in evaluating assessment use. Realising intended forms of impact relies on more than the design of an assessment: account must also be taken of the ways in which teachers, learners and others understand the demands of the assessment and incorporate these into their practice. The measures that testing agencies take to present and explicate their tests to teachers and other stakeholders therefore play an important role in promoting intended impact and mitigating unintended, negative impact. Materials that support teachers in preparing learners to take tests (such as descriptions of the test, preparation materials and teacher training resources) play an important role in communicating the test providers’ intentions. In this study, these support materials are analysed. The selected materials, provided to teachers by Cambridge English Language Assessment, go with the Speaking component of a major international test of general English proficiency: Cambridge English: First. The study addresses how these materials might embody or reflect learning-oriented assessment principles of task authenticity, learner engagement and feedback within a coherent systemic theory of action, reconciling formative and summative assessment functions to the benefit of learning.
Affiliation:
University of Bedfordshire
Citation:
Green A (2017) 'Learning-oriented Language Test Preparation Materials: A contradiction in terms?', Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6 (1), pp.112-132.
Publisher:
Association for Language Testing and Assessment of Australia and New Zealand (ALTAANZ)
Journal:
Papers in Language Testing and Assessment
Issue Date:
10-Nov-2017
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622430
Additional Links:
http://www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/8.si6green_final_formatted_proofed.pdf; http://www.altaanz.org/papers-in-language-testing-and-assessment-plta.html
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
2201-0009
Appears in Collections:
English language learning and assessment

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Anthonyen
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T09:11:30Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-30T09:11:30Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-10-
dc.identifier.citationGreen A (2017) 'Learning-oriented Language Test Preparation Materials: A contradiction in terms?', Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6 (1), pp.112-132.en
dc.identifier.issn2201-0009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622430-
dc.description.abstractThe impact of the use of assessment on teaching and learning is increasingly regarded as a key concern in evaluating assessment use. Realising intended forms of impact relies on more than the design of an assessment: account must also be taken of the ways in which teachers, learners and others understand the demands of the assessment and incorporate these into their practice. The measures that testing agencies take to present and explicate their tests to teachers and other stakeholders therefore play an important role in promoting intended impact and mitigating unintended, negative impact. Materials that support teachers in preparing learners to take tests (such as descriptions of the test, preparation materials and teacher training resources) play an important role in communicating the test providers’ intentions. In this study, these support materials are analysed. The selected materials, provided to teachers by Cambridge English Language Assessment, go with the Speaking component of a major international test of general English proficiency: Cambridge English: First. The study addresses how these materials might embody or reflect learning-oriented assessment principles of task authenticity, learner engagement and feedback within a coherent systemic theory of action, reconciling formative and summative assessment functions to the benefit of learning.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAssociation for Language Testing and Assessment of Australia and New Zealand (ALTAANZ)en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/8.si6green_final_formatted_proofed.pdfen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.altaanz.org/papers-in-language-testing-and-assessment-plta.htmlen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectlanguage assessmenten
dc.titleLearning-oriented language test preparation materials: a contradiction in terms?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.identifier.journalPapers in Language Testing and Assessmenten
dc.date.updated2017-11-30T09:05:46Z-
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UOBREP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.