Implementation intention and planning interventions in health psychology: recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622305
Title:
Implementation intention and planning interventions in health psychology: recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice
Authors:
Hagger, Martin S.; Luszczynska, Aleksandra; de Wit, John; Benyamini, Yael; Burkert, Silke; Chamberland, Pier-Eric; Chater, Angel M. ( 0000-0002-9043-2565 ) ; Dombrowski, Stephan U.; van Dongen, Anne; French, David P.; Gauchet, Aurelie; Hankonen, Nelli; Karekla, Maria; Kinney, Anita Y.; Kwasnicka, Dominika; Hing Lo, Siu; López-Roig, Sofia; Meslot, Carine; Marques, Marta Moreira; Neter, Efrat; Plass, Anne Marie; Potthoff, Sebastian; Rennie, Laura; Scholz, Urte; Stadler, Gertraud; Stolte, Elske; ten Hoor, Gill; Verhoeven, Aukje; Wagner, Monika; Oettingen, Gabriele; Sheeran, Paschal; Gollwitzer, Peter
Abstract:
The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.
Citation:
Hagger M., Luszczynska A., de Wit J., Benyamini Y., Burkert S., Chamberland P., Chater A., Dombrowski S., van Dongen A., French D., Gauchet A., Hankonen N., Karekla M., Kinney A., Kwasnicka D., Hing Lo S., López-Roig S., Meslot C., Marques M., Neter E., Plass A., Potthoff S., Rennie L., Scholz U., Stadler G., Stolte E., ten Hoor G., Verhoeven A., Wagner M., Oettingen G., Sheeran P., Gollwitzer P. (2016) 'Implementation intention and planning interventions in health psychology: recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice', Psychology and Health, 31 (7), pp.814-839.
Publisher:
Routledge
Journal:
Psychology and Health
Issue Date:
16-Mar-2016
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622305
DOI:
10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719
Additional Links:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0887-0446
Appears in Collections:
Psychology

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin S.en
dc.contributor.authorLuszczynska, Aleksandraen
dc.contributor.authorde Wit, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorBenyamini, Yaelen
dc.contributor.authorBurkert, Silkeen
dc.contributor.authorChamberland, Pier-Ericen
dc.contributor.authorChater, Angel M.en
dc.contributor.authorDombrowski, Stephan U.en
dc.contributor.authorvan Dongen, Anneen
dc.contributor.authorFrench, David P.en
dc.contributor.authorGauchet, Aurelieen
dc.contributor.authorHankonen, Nellien
dc.contributor.authorKarekla, Mariaen
dc.contributor.authorKinney, Anita Y.en
dc.contributor.authorKwasnicka, Dominikaen
dc.contributor.authorHing Lo, Siuen
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Roig, Sofiaen
dc.contributor.authorMeslot, Carineen
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Marta Moreiraen
dc.contributor.authorNeter, Efraten
dc.contributor.authorPlass, Anne Marieen
dc.contributor.authorPotthoff, Sebastianen
dc.contributor.authorRennie, Lauraen
dc.contributor.authorScholz, Urteen
dc.contributor.authorStadler, Gertrauden
dc.contributor.authorStolte, Elskeen
dc.contributor.authorten Hoor, Gillen
dc.contributor.authorVerhoeven, Aukjeen
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Monikaen
dc.contributor.authorOettingen, Gabrieleen
dc.contributor.authorSheeran, Paschalen
dc.contributor.authorGollwitzer, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T13:06:03Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-24T13:06:03Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-16-
dc.identifier.citationHagger M., Luszczynska A., de Wit J., Benyamini Y., Burkert S., Chamberland P., Chater A., Dombrowski S., van Dongen A., French D., Gauchet A., Hankonen N., Karekla M., Kinney A., Kwasnicka D., Hing Lo S., López-Roig S., Meslot C., Marques M., Neter E., Plass A., Potthoff S., Rennie L., Scholz U., Stadler G., Stolte E., ten Hoor G., Verhoeven A., Wagner M., Oettingen G., Sheeran P., Gollwitzer P. (2016) 'Implementation intention and planning interventions in health psychology: recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice', Psychology and Health, 31 (7), pp.814-839.en
dc.identifier.issn0887-0446-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622305-
dc.description.abstractThe current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719en
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectvolitionen
dc.subjectcues-to-actionen
dc.subjectimplementation intentionsen
dc.subjectif-then plansen
dc.subjectgoal strivingen
dc.subjectplanningen
dc.subjecthealth psychologyen
dc.subjectC841 Health Psychologyen
dc.titleImplementation intention and planning interventions in health psychology: recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practiceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalPsychology and Healthen
dc.date.updated2017-10-24T11:29:08Z-
dc.description.noteno file attached but is pre April 2016-
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UOBREP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.