A review of literature relevant to a study of students' views of their learning on a psychodynamic psychotherapeutic course

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622018
Title:
A review of literature relevant to a study of students' views of their learning on a psychodynamic psychotherapeutic course
Authors:
Pape, Nick R.; Wearmouth, Janice
Abstract:
This paper focuses on the literature underpinning the use of an analytic framework based on aspects of both psychodynamic theories and socio-cultural understandings of the learning process to underpin a study of students' perceptions of facilitating factors that enable learnign of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychodynamic approaches to psychotherapy have within them no intrinsic theory of learning. To study the learning process, as reported by students, therefore requires reliance on an external theoretical model that is sufficiently compatible with psychodynamic theory and that does not distort either the research process or the interpretation of data in a way that is unrecognisable to adherents of a psychodynamic perspective. Psychodynamic learning cannot be undertaken on an instructional basis but only by authentic learning tasks grounded in the personal interests of learners. Is is for this reason that a sociocultural constructivist view of the learning process was chosen as being appropriate to integrate into a framework through which to view psychodynamic therapeutic learning. The research sought to explore how learners created and applied perceptions of what helped learning. A qualitative case study design was employed with eight randomly selected participants from Higher Education institutes. Analysis of data from interviews, observations and document collection, using a framework derived from sociocultural understandings of learning as well as psychodynamic theories, enabled the emergence of nine themes: autonomy; self-changes; closeness; encouragement/discouragement; individual learning process; listening; ambivalence about judging the tutor; private life; self-esteem and confidence. The over-arching theme that emerged was the tutor-student relationship, understandable in sociocultural constructivist terms as enabling learning witin a Vygotskyian zone of proximal development and the Bowlbian concept of provision of a safe base from which students journeyed towards autonomous independent learning.
Citation:
Pape NR, Wearmouth J (2016) 'A review of literature relevant to a study of students' views of their learning on a psychodynamic psychotherapeutic course', Journal of Contemporary Development & Management Studies, 4 (1), pp.9-22.
Publisher:
London Churchill College
Journal:
Journal of Contemporary Development & Management Studies
Issue Date:
31-Dec-2016
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622018
Additional Links:
http://londonchurchillcollege.co.uk/downloads/170125 Journal Winter 2016.pdf
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
2052-6797
Appears in Collections:
Education

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorPape, Nick R.en
dc.contributor.authorWearmouth, Janiceen
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-10T14:01:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-10T14:01:55Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-31-
dc.identifier.citationPape NR, Wearmouth J (2016) 'A review of literature relevant to a study of students' views of their learning on a psychodynamic psychotherapeutic course', Journal of Contemporary Development & Management Studies, 4 (1), pp.9-22.en
dc.identifier.issn2052-6797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622018-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the literature underpinning the use of an analytic framework based on aspects of both psychodynamic theories and socio-cultural understandings of the learning process to underpin a study of students' perceptions of facilitating factors that enable learnign of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychodynamic approaches to psychotherapy have within them no intrinsic theory of learning. To study the learning process, as reported by students, therefore requires reliance on an external theoretical model that is sufficiently compatible with psychodynamic theory and that does not distort either the research process or the interpretation of data in a way that is unrecognisable to adherents of a psychodynamic perspective. Psychodynamic learning cannot be undertaken on an instructional basis but only by authentic learning tasks grounded in the personal interests of learners. Is is for this reason that a sociocultural constructivist view of the learning process was chosen as being appropriate to integrate into a framework through which to view psychodynamic therapeutic learning. The research sought to explore how learners created and applied perceptions of what helped learning. A qualitative case study design was employed with eight randomly selected participants from Higher Education institutes. Analysis of data from interviews, observations and document collection, using a framework derived from sociocultural understandings of learning as well as psychodynamic theories, enabled the emergence of nine themes: autonomy; self-changes; closeness; encouragement/discouragement; individual learning process; listening; ambivalence about judging the tutor; private life; self-esteem and confidence. The over-arching theme that emerged was the tutor-student relationship, understandable in sociocultural constructivist terms as enabling learning witin a Vygotskyian zone of proximal development and the Bowlbian concept of provision of a safe base from which students journeyed towards autonomous independent learning.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLondon Churchill Collegeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://londonchurchillcollege.co.uk/downloads/170125 Journal Winter 2016.pdfen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectpsychodynamic psychotherapyen
dc.subjectsociocultual constructivismen
dc.subjectstudent viewsen
dc.subjectlearningen
dc.subjectX300 Academic studies in Educationen
dc.titleA review of literature relevant to a study of students' views of their learning on a psychodynamic psychotherapeutic courseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Contemporary Development & Management Studiesen
dc.date.updated2017-02-10T13:58:11Z-
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UOBREP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.