Is systematic synthetic phonics enough? examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one class

2.00
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/296187
Title:
Is systematic synthetic phonics enough? examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one class
Authors:
Watts, Zoe; Gardner, Paul
Abstract:
A comparative analysis of systematic synthetic phonics (SSP) and the intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) revealed the latter had greater impact on pupils’ reading attainment and fluency. Data were collected using multiple methods, including miscue analysis, Salford Reading Test, a phoneme skills test and HFW audits.
Citation:
Watts, Z. & Gardner, P. (2013) 'Is systematic synthetic phonics enough? Examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one class', Education 3-13, 41 (1), pp.100-109
Publisher:
Taylor and Francis
Journal:
Education 3-13
Issue Date:
2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/296187
DOI:
10.1080/03004279.2012.710105
Additional Links:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03004279.2012.710105
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0300-4279; 1475-7575
Appears in Collections:
Primary Practitioner Research Group

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorWatts, Zoeen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Paulen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-16T10:06:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-16T10:06:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationWatts, Z. & Gardner, P. (2013) 'Is systematic synthetic phonics enough? Examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one class', Education 3-13, 41 (1), pp.100-109en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0300-4279-
dc.identifier.issn1475-7575-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03004279.2012.710105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/296187-
dc.description.abstractA comparative analysis of systematic synthetic phonics (SSP) and the intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) revealed the latter had greater impact on pupils’ reading attainment and fluency. Data were collected using multiple methods, including miscue analysis, Salford Reading Test, a phoneme skills test and HFW audits.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03004279.2012.710105en_GB
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Education 3-13en_GB
dc.subjectsynthetic phonicsen_GB
dc.subjecthigh frequency wordsen_GB
dc.subjectearly readingen_GB
dc.subjectphonicsen_GB
dc.subjectreadingen_GB
dc.titleIs systematic synthetic phonics enough? examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one classen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalEducation 3-13en_GB
All Items in UOBREP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.