2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/251154
Title:
Construction risk modelling and assessment: insights from a literature review
Authors:
Taroun, Abdulmaten; Yang, J.B.; Lowe, D.
Abstract:
Although risk assessment is probably the most difficult component of the Risk Management process, it is potentially the most useful. A critical review of the literature published on the topic over the last 27 years has revealed significant results, summarized as follows. Variants of Probability-Impact modeling are predominant; while traditionally the focus was on objective probability gradually subjective probability has become dominant. Risk analysis of project duration or cost is prevalent; the analysis of project performance risk is hardly mentioned in literature. Further, no risk assessment approach was discovered that deploys a common scale to simultaneously assess the alternative impacts of a risk on the various project objectives. Most of the existing approaches provide a risk rating; very few actually quantify risk. The limitations of the existing theories and tools indicate the need for improved alternatives. We conclude that the use of ‘risk cost’ as a common scale within a belief-based decision making framework would be an innovative solution, overcoming current shortcomings and generally improving construction risk assessment.
Citation:
Taroun, A., Yang, J.B, Lowe, D. (2011) 'Construction Risk Modelling and Assessment: Insights from a Literature Review', The Built and Human Environment Review 4 (1)
Publisher:
Built & Human Environment Reivew
Journal:
The Built and Human Environment Review
Issue Date:
2011
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10547/251154
Additional Links:
http://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/search/advancedResults
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1759-0574
Appears in Collections:
Business and Information Systems Research Centre (BISC)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorTaroun, Abdulmatenen_GB
dc.contributor.authorYang, J.B.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorLowe, D.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-06T08:55:10Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-06T08:55:10Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationTaroun, A., Yang, J.B, Lowe, D. (2011) 'Construction Risk Modelling and Assessment: Insights from a Literature Review', The Built and Human Environment Review 4 (1)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1759-0574-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/251154-
dc.description.abstractAlthough risk assessment is probably the most difficult component of the Risk Management process, it is potentially the most useful. A critical review of the literature published on the topic over the last 27 years has revealed significant results, summarized as follows. Variants of Probability-Impact modeling are predominant; while traditionally the focus was on objective probability gradually subjective probability has become dominant. Risk analysis of project duration or cost is prevalent; the analysis of project performance risk is hardly mentioned in literature. Further, no risk assessment approach was discovered that deploys a common scale to simultaneously assess the alternative impacts of a risk on the various project objectives. Most of the existing approaches provide a risk rating; very few actually quantify risk. The limitations of the existing theories and tools indicate the need for improved alternatives. We conclude that the use of ‘risk cost’ as a common scale within a belief-based decision making framework would be an innovative solution, overcoming current shortcomings and generally improving construction risk assessment.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBuilt & Human Environment Reivewen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/search/advancedResultsen_GB
dc.subjectrisk assessment, risk modelling, risk cost, Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, literature review.en_GB
dc.titleConstruction risk modelling and assessment: insights from a literature reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalThe Built and Human Environment Reviewen_GB
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UOBREP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.