Introducing the Palliative Performance Scale to clinicians: the Grampian experience
Abstract
Objectives The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) was introduced across NHS Grampian. Our aim was to determine how practical and useful the PPS was for clinicians looking after palliative patients in a variety of settings. Methods A prospective audit approach was used in primary, secondary and nursing home care settings who. Demographic and assessment data were gathered for 3 months; feedback was gathered at the end of the data collection phase. Patient follow-up status was determined at 12 months. Results Fifteen clinical sites participated and feedback was obtained from all clinical areas (n=30). Most respondents found the PPS easy to use and that it helped recognise disease progression in cancer patients, but not in patients with dementia/frailty. Assessment data were gathered on 666 patients. Sixty per cent had a malignant diagnosis and 62.5% of the sample died within 12 months. Lower PPS scores at initial assessment indicated poorer prognosis. Median survival figures differed from previously published data. Falling PPS scores increased the risk of death compared with patients whose PPS scores remained static or improved. Conclusion Clinicians found the PPS to be a quick, useful way of assessing and reviewing functional changes in palliative patients. However, it may not identify the subtle changes in individuals with advanced dementia. The survival figures confirm that caution is needed in generalising survival data across different settings and populations. Further work is needed to examine changing functional status in patients with non-malignant diseases or dementia/frailty.Citation
Linklater, G., Lawton, S., Fielding, S., Macaulay, L., Carroll, D. & Pang, D. (2012) 'Introducing the Palliative Performance Scale to clinicians: The Grampian experience', BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2 (2), pp.121-126.Publisher
BMJJournal
BMJ Supportive & Palliative CarePubMed ID
24654052Additional Links
http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000133Type
ArticleISSN
2045-435X2045-4368
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000133
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
Related articles
- Is the palliative performance scale a useful predictor of mortality in a heterogeneous hospice population?
- Authors: Harrold J, Rickerson E, Carroll JT, McGrath J, Morales K, Kapo J, Casarett D
- Issue date: 2005 Jun
- Validation of the palliative performance scale in the acute tertiary care hospital setting.
- Authors: Olajide O, Hanson L, Usher BM, Qaqish BF, Schwartz R, Bernard S
- Issue date: 2007 Feb
- Use of the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) for end-of-life prognostication in a palliative medicine consultation service.
- Authors: Lau F, Maida V, Downing M, Lesperance M, Karlson N, Kuziemsky C
- Issue date: 2009 Jun
- Revisiting the Palliative Performance Scale: change in scores during disease trajectory predicts survival.
- Authors: Chan EY, Wu HY, Chan YH
- Issue date: 2013 Apr
- Enhancing communication in end-of-life care: a clinical tool translating between the Clinical Frailty Scale and the Palliative Performance Scale.
- Authors: Grossman D, Rootenberg M, Perri GA, Yogaparan T, DeLeon M, Calabrese S, Grief CJ, Moore J, Gill A, Stilos K, Daines P, Zimmermann C, Mazzotta P
- Issue date: 2014 Aug